Hopefully it is him!

My understanding is that existing stations were grandfathered but need to be brought up to compliance once major renovations are made.

Without funding associated with the passage of the ADA, transportation agencies had no ability to renovate all their stations.

Removed, copyright infringement

Can he?

> These are not pets they are commitments

All pets are commitments!

Typically not a write off if you get something out of it but a portion may be considered a donation for tax purposes.

If so, PHS will include that info in your receipt.

Not to be confused with the furry orange monster from the Wells Fargo center

There is tax on interest, dividends and some short term gains. Long term gains aren't taxed but that can easily be included.

>If you have a wage tax, why not tax the really rich who come here to retire and live off their retirement/capital ?

There is already a tax on investment earnings.

Philly isn't a huge retirement destination and likely wouldn't be if taxes on this type of income went up significantly.

Easy enough for people to live in the suburbs and come in for dining and entertainment. Especially towns along PATCO or RR

>Sharing that our city ranks well among global cities in these areas is misleading? It wasn’t intended to be.

Well in these areas from a global investor perspective is different than from a resident perspective.

Also, global asset management is probably peak neoliberalism. I say that as a neoliberal working in that industry.

>Neoliberalism is contemporarily used to refer to market-oriented reform policies such as "eliminating price controls, deregulating capital markets, lowering trade barriers" and reducing, especially through privatization and austerity, state influence in the economy.

>> Policy risk > >Eh, I guess.

Policy risk for investors is high in places like Shenzen. Capital controls and CCP influence is high.

Berlin less so but strong organized labor is a potential policy risk.

That comment doesn't change what the intended audience for this list orv why using this list for other purposes is misleading.

Thanks for your feedback

It matters a lot. The places that are easy to invest in and extract profit aren't necessarily the best for actual living. Particularly in the regulatory environment category.

It is a really complex discussion I don't have time to explain in detail but kinda interesting you said "i don't think you're familiar with Schroders" and then subsequently say you know nothing about asset management.

>I don't think it's bias so much as the methodologies used, but I could be wrong. For example, Shenzen has a 28 out of 30 "environmental" rating.

Bias absolutely can exist in methodology

Yea, without that it is hard to really evaluate this list.

This is a list made for asset managers to evaluate investments.

I'd be really curious how they evaluate places like Sao Paulo or Buenos Aires in terms of environmental impact. Sure, they may feel the pain of climate change more than Chicago or Philadelphia but they aren't contributing to the problem nearly as much as Chicago or Philadelphia.

This is a good list for what it was made for but I don't think it should be taken beyond that.

Do you have a link to the full 900 cities?

It does seem like there is bias toward certain nations and regions given the top 30.

They are also an asset manager so not surprising the top cities for asset management are on the list

>Oh dude your not supposed to change shit.

. . . >What we should be doing is driving economy vehicles but then have off-roaders or drag cars or something. > >Or just not even have personal vehicles. Use trains and streetcars to get around walkable towns. Then have faster trains for transport in-between cities.

This is a pretty big change for most Americans

Increasing the percentage of renewables is great but it isn't enough considering China is focused on high GDP growth.

If the economy grows so fast that they still need to add massive amounts of coal to meet their goals, we're still fucked.

You mean they don't defy the laws of physics?

Itv is probably fine if in a climate controlled environment.

Leaving it out in a hot car is probably the biggest risk

That requires the mod team to review every editorialized title.

We're not going to do that.

Expiration dates on water are more about the plastic leeching in than water going bad and I've seen anywhere from 6 months to 2 years from manufacture.

Bottled water sucks and should minimized to when it is really needed but this water is likely fine as you said

Also interesting. They have a website not really organized like a news site but you can read their paper!

https://www.eastfallscommunity.org/eastfallsnow

We don't accept unconfirmed "industry insider" information.

Posts regarding matters of public safety require legitimate sources.

As an industry insider, I hope you can appreciate why at don't accept unsourced information

Removed, post the article with original title.