firewolf8385
firewolf8385 t1_ja9a622 wrote
I just renewed and it took about a month
firewolf8385 t1_j6jesb4 wrote
Reply to comment by ThunderSk33t in Small US city starter pack by [deleted]
There was one until 1936 apparently, when it was destroyed in a flood
Edit: I mean a zoo, should’ve clarified before
firewolf8385 t1_j5qeg9k wrote
Reply to Why does this state seem to lose power so frequently? It’s always related to downed power lines from trees? Or is this a grid issue? by JayBisky
I can’t remember the last time I’ve lost power. Definitely been a couple years. I live just outside of Concord
firewolf8385 t1_j5dcstm wrote
Reply to comment by Reddit_in_her_voice in Why Does N.H. Still Require Annual Car Inspections? by snooshoe
Fair enough. Figured the state saw at least some of the money, be it through the fees themselves or the certification process. If the state sees nothing from it, then I agree it’s definitely pointless, especially seeing the kinds of vehicles that make it through anyways.
firewolf8385 t1_j5dbdzt wrote
Reply to comment by Reddit_in_her_voice in Why Does N.H. Still Require Annual Car Inspections? by snooshoe
That money has to come from somewhere. If it’s abolished, taxes will increase on something else instead
firewolf8385 t1_j2v8jg7 wrote
Reply to comment by NckMcC in AG: Police shot and killed teenager allegedly armed with knife in Gilford | New Hampshire Public Radio by ACOdysseybeatsRDR2
They wouldn’t have been there if that’s all he was doing. Even a best case scenario he was threatening someone (likely his parents) with the knife in some way.
The lack of info is likely the police department dragging things out until the blowback is minor, regardless if the shooting was justified or not. The news won’t report on anything that the police department doesn’t say in order to not get sued.
firewolf8385 t1_j0ue7uk wrote
Reply to comment by njm123niu in How would the economies be if AI takes most / all the jobs? by Charming-Coconut-234
They didn’t bring the need for labor up though, it’s not like people just didn’t have jobs beforehand. First most people were farmers, then most people become factory workers, and now most people are part of the information economy. Those technologies replaced human labor and allowed other jobs to form. AI will likely much automate the Information economy, and we’ll enter a new era. I’d imagine we’ll either switch to more of a service and leisure economy or a more research and development economy(with AI as a tool to make that stuff easier), but we won’t know until we get there.
If AI could do absolutely everything, we will be made obsolete and humanity will die off anyways.
firewolf8385 t1_j0te7wi wrote
Reply to comment by njm123niu in How would the economies be if AI takes most / all the jobs? by Charming-Coconut-234
See my edit above: The jobs won’t disappear, they’ll change industries, just like every time before
firewolf8385 t1_j0tcrp6 wrote
Reply to comment by njm123niu in How would the economies be if AI takes most / all the jobs? by Charming-Coconut-234
You’re thinking of AI in the wrong light. AI is a tool for humans to use. It facilitates humans to create and do tasks, but can’t do them on its own. Some examples that ChatGPT have shown is programming, art, writing, etc. ChatGPT makes those much easier, but it needs a human to guide it to the answer we want. Technology for AI to truly think for itself and require no human intervention at all is easily 100 years away at best, if it ever comes at all.
Edit: Also, those examples did replace labor. We used to have entire office buildings full of people dedicated to crunching numbers all day. A single farmer today can cover an area that would take hundreds of farmers 200 years ago. The jobs didn’t just “disappear”, they shifted to other industries. Every new technology just allows humans to diversify more.
firewolf8385 t1_j0t4rvq wrote
Reply to comment by Omegalazarus in How would the economies be if AI takes most / all the jobs? by Charming-Coconut-234
Fair enough, the Industrial Revolution was more of an idea for societal change based on new technologies rather than the technology itself. Probably should have said the steam engine there instead
firewolf8385 t1_j0t4jei wrote
Reply to comment by ImthatRootuser in How would the economies be if AI takes most / all the jobs? by Charming-Coconut-234
AI of course will take some jobs, but it will never be able to do everything, especially by itself. The furthest AI can ever really get programming-wise is as an assistant for example, you still need someone pulling the strings. As AI improves it’ll definitely drastically change industries, and learning how to use it will be a desired skill, but it’ll still need a human involved somewhere in the process.
firewolf8385 t1_j0sfubt wrote
People say this every time a disruptive technology has come around. The economy didn’t end after the Industrial Revolution, it didn’t end with the invention of assembly lines, it didn’t end with computers, and didn’t end with industrial robots. People adapt, and new jobs take their places
firewolf8385 t1_iyph0q1 wrote
Reply to comment by ifukkedurbich in Would you care if NH lost the first presidential primary? by GraniteGeekNH
The average net worth of candidates would probably increase due to how expensive it is to campaign in larger states. That’s the only thing I can think of
firewolf8385 t1_is345wd wrote
I can’t escape it. Somehow one of the parties got ahold of my info and now send me texts and letters too, it’s driving me insane
firewolf8385 t1_jbw8t3z wrote
Reply to comment by jondaley in Jobs by Wumboalt1
Can confirm that, as a mechanical engineering student currently in the process of finding a summer internship, there’s not many engineering jobs in the state. Even less with internship spots. Best luck I’ve had so far is places an hour or more away.