econ101user
econ101user t1_j61ixnx wrote
Reply to comment by Tearakan in IBM Cuts 3,900 Jobs In Latest Tech Layoffs by itsonlyeva
> By overall GDP we are.
Why on gods green earth would you think that mattered?
> My argument about climate change is we can't keep global capitalism which is defined by endless economic growth.
So this is just all blather. Capitalism isn't defined by endless growth. Go find a book that defines it as such. Seriously stop talking and go find a book, open it and read it.
>That's incompatible with actually surviving climate change
Why?
> Endless economic growth requires either energy increasing endlessly or increasing efficiency. We literally cannot get to 100 percent efficiency thanks to thermodynamics.
Hahahahahahahahaha.
So let me get this straight. Your argument is that based on your made up definition that capitalism requires infinite growth, that will require infinite energy which violates the laws of thermodynamics ergo capitalism is causing climate change.
Be honest with me: are you a teenager? You need to stop. You're just saying dumber and dumber shit.
> Finally, healthcare and life expectancy are two very important parts of a good human life. You can't just throw them away from the whole "people are getting better due to increasing GDP" argument.
I didn't throw them away. Theyre in the HDI. I just didn't cherry pick like you did.
I'm going to make this straight for you: economic growth is not a bad thing. It's strongly correlated with human living conditions. A growing economy is not one that is incompatible with policies that mitigate the growth and impacts of climate change. Or in crayon: more money in the system is better for everyone, you should try to make it more fair but overall it's a good thing. You can make money off non-carbon producing activities. The technology exists today to meet the overwhelm majority of energy needs currently provided by fossil fuels. It is a policy problem, not an economic one.
econ101user t1_j61bvlq wrote
Reply to comment by Tearakan in IBM Cuts 3,900 Jobs In Latest Tech Layoffs by itsonlyeva
> Our GDP is the best on the planet in the US.
Did you even bother to do a 10 second google before opening your mouth hole? The US is not the number one https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita
But even your incorrect cherry picking isn't a valid counterpoint to a correlation.
That's like saying "no height doesn't matter for success in basketball. My uncle is 6'6" and sucks at hoops".
> As just one example of better lives.
Cool bro. Guess what we're not just picking single examples like US and healthcare.
Look at this data plot and stop talking https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/human-development-index-vs-gdp-per-capita
> Wage growth for the majority of Americans has not beat inflation
What does that have to do with anything? You think because eggs are more expensive that economic growth isn't linked to quality of life? Are you just shouting out random grievances?
> Yeah maybe look up climate change. It's a civilization ender. Especially if we can't farm because of wildly swinging temperatures and weather.
Okay what's your point? You think our choices are: grow the economy or solve climate change? That's a talking point created by fossil fuel industry interests to scare people into supporting measures to address it, staging a shift from carbon emitting activity as damaging to the economy. It's been refuted very well yet here we have not only right wing idiots believing it but left wing ones too. That's hilarious.
econ101user t1_j6137ch wrote
Reply to comment by Tearakan in IBM Cuts 3,900 Jobs In Latest Tech Layoffs by itsonlyeva
> Constant economic growth does not mean constant progress.
Just a coincidence I guess then that higher GDP correlates with higher quality of life.
> inequality being the worst its ever been
Not even close.
> Oh and this little thing called climate change which we keep ignoring in favor of more economic growth.
Economic growth doesn't have to stop to address combat change.
>So about 500 years of progress leading us to utter ruin
Utter ruin? You need to read a history book and touch grass.
>Not a great run for an economic system compared to the rest of human civilization's history.
What a shame this world is wasted on you. Somewhere in time there's a peasant in medieval Europe that deserves to swap time with you
econ101user t1_j6119xx wrote
Reply to comment by abnmfr in Coinbase’s chief product officer will leave with a $105 million payday by CrankyBear
I know right. Same with being a pro-quarterback. It's really hard to become one but super easy to be one. You just throw a ball and get millions of dollars after spending most your life working to outdo millions of others who want to be in the same position.
econ101user t1_j5xjbva wrote
Reply to comment by infoagerevolutionist in Coinbase’s chief product officer will leave with a $105 million payday by CrankyBear
Then why don't you do it if it's so easy? Why aren't you a useless executive?
econ101user t1_j5xi1z8 wrote
Reply to comment by Tearakan in IBM Cuts 3,900 Jobs In Latest Tech Layoffs by itsonlyeva
Yeah it's really fucked up that capitalist democracies keep expecting constant progress. And what have we got in return? The fastest advance of living conditions in human history? Life's gotta better for everyone so quickly in the last 200 years why not stop now and agree on no more improvement
econ101user t1_j5xhv9e wrote
Reply to comment by westplains1865 in IBM Cuts 3,900 Jobs In Latest Tech Layoffs by itsonlyeva
Why? The stock market isn't meant to be a moral compass. It's a vote in companies fiscal viability.
There's nothing wrong with the stock market. There's something wrong with how people view it's place is society
econ101user t1_iu2u2u4 wrote
Reply to comment by Heres_your_sign in Canada House of Commons unanimously agrees to describe residential schools as genocide by shpydar
It wasn't as violent or vicious but the intent was the same: to erase a people's.
Just because it's not as bad as the worst example doesn't mean it doesn't deserve the title. Like when the Boston Marathon bombing happened and 3 people were killed and the news calls it terrorism did you split hairs and say "does it really deserve the same designation as 9/11? Really. It's only 3 people compared to thousands and no iconic buildings were destroyed. It's not the same thing".
You probably didn't. Most people probably didn't.
Because it doesn't make them uncomfortable to admit someone they don't identify with sucks. But when it's someone like you it's natural to be defensive and not want unflattering comparisons. Gotta suck it up and admit Canada were dicks yo.
econ101user t1_j65ubqh wrote
Reply to comment by infoagerevolutionist in Coinbase’s chief product officer will leave with a $105 million payday by CrankyBear
CEOs are useless?