eNonsense

eNonsense t1_ja3xtdy wrote

If you're failing to follow your company's policies, you're not doing your job. Is that something you disagree with?

I fail to see how this is the responsibility of the person who wrote the script for a policy that this situation does not apply to.

The mental gymnastics that some people will resort to to maintain that they weren't simply incorrect. Talking about conspiracies that companies would intentionally poorly train their employees to not follow their own policies which were likely created and instituted to shield them from legal liability in the first place.

1

eNonsense t1_ja3my4m wrote

What, because this employee didn't follow Volkswagens policy to assist law enforcement, and VW is owning up to the mistake made by the employee? Did you actually read the article? Or just assumed what was going on after reading the headline, which you also failed to understand?

3

eNonsense t1_ja3m81m wrote

VW said in the article that they have a policy for assisting law enforcement with these requests and it's worked successfully in the past. However this employee was not following policy and VW owned up to the mistake. That sounds to me like VW is on the side of giving help to find the child without insisting on reinstating subscription payments first.

I think many of the people in this thread are taking this the wrong way, and likely didn't actually read the article. Seems common in this sub.

19

eNonsense t1_j8xba82 wrote

There's literally a comment in the article from the venue owning up to the oversight and saying they're committed to being more prepared in the future. Don't you think that if there was a ramp backstage, the venue would have used their press comment to tell everyone "sorry about that, but it was a mixup and they could have just gone backstage but they didn't ask."

Everyone in this thread who didn't bother to read the article or use their brain for 60 seconds are so damn sure of themselves and their own horseshit. lol.

13