drekwithoutpolitics

drekwithoutpolitics t1_je5ko7y wrote

I want to say that consoles with discs were where I started thinking that I shouldn’t put them on the floor… but I still might have until the PS2, I can’t remember exactly.

For me it was a combination of: me getting older (and having something to put a console in/on), consoles existing that took up less space (the PS2 could be vertical, for example), optical drives potentially being more sensitive to dust, and the consoles having more fans.

There’s more factors to it than I expected when I started writing this, haha. That generation of NES was like a tank for me too, the only thing that ever had problems were the contacts to connect to the cartridge. Everything else worked like a charm until I finally had to get rid of the thing.

1

drekwithoutpolitics t1_ix3nd2t wrote

I could see Morse being harder to get started and way easier to get discouraged if I’m already quite disabled and wanting to write a novel.

Someone mentioned they had an alphabet ordered by letter frequency, so I could see the two of them optimizing quickly.

Like, at the beginning of a sentence,

“S” blink

Ok… it’s not another S. “A…” no blink “E,” etc. as a simple example.

5

drekwithoutpolitics t1_ivfesyd wrote

Can someone tell me what the fuck “simultaneously” means in the title?

They were simultaneously devoted to sex, incest, and flagellation?

The issues were simultaneously published?

“Three erotic tales simultaneously,”

r/Titlegore

1

drekwithoutpolitics t1_iu096f0 wrote

I still don’t think that’s talent, but I appreciate the weird “knocking down others to make yourself feel better.” That’s me, knocking down Mark Zuckerberg to make myself feel better!

What a weird way to spend your time, defending Mark Zuckerberg’s supposed “talent.” Are you sure we have the same definition of “talent?”

Talent: a natural aptitude or skill. That asshole absolutely did not have any natural aptitude for taking companies public, he barely had a natural aptitude for programming. He had tutors from a young age. He stole an idea and got others to help him run with it.

As if a whole company didn’t do the things you’re listing. Give me a break.

But keep going! Apparently there are Zuckerberg apologists and I’m here for them.

1

drekwithoutpolitics t1_itzjx5m wrote

But that’s still a very bad sign to me, given that most people seem to know their VR research isn’t likely to pay off for a long time, if at all. Net income down 35%? Holy shit, even if 15% of that was for the (vanity) VR investment, that’s insane to me!

The VR investment reminds me a little bit of Microsoft buying Skype for $8.5 billion in 2011. It was Microsoft’s biggest purchase ever at the time, and you could argue it absolutely didn’t pay off investment-wise for MS. The tech isn’t worth $8.5 billion.

The difference is that Microsoft had other things going for it. Meta has WhatsApp and Instagram, but it’s not clear to me how they’ll recoup their losses on this VR stuff without shutting it down in a few years in another embarrassment.

1

drekwithoutpolitics t1_itzhzdo wrote

I don’t think it takes talent. It takes connections, wealth, and a staff of people. But talent doesn’t have a ton to do with it. It’s not like he took the company public, the company had thousands of employees at that time.

Being a sociopath might help, but that’s not a talent either.

Also, “almost nothing” is kind of misrepresenting how privileged he was as a kid.

Talent. Ok. 🙄

6