californiarepublik
californiarepublik t1_j9xcn7v wrote
Reply to We are in the early days of AI used as tool for biological design. It’s potential to design new proteins + DNA sequences from the building blocks of life is astonishing. by MichaelTen
What could go wrong?
FWIW this is literally one of Yudkowsky’s scenarios for how AI could end us.
californiarepublik t1_j8s0vco wrote
Reply to comment by Dawnof_thefaithful in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
been inside too long
californiarepublik t1_j8s0stn wrote
Reply to comment by genericrich in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
IS an early sign.
californiarepublik t1_j8s0p7w wrote
Reply to comment by Ghost-of-Tom-Chode in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
Yeah it's fine most of the time as long as you treat it carefully, what could go wrong? We might as well go ahead and put it in a position of authority where it's making crucial real-time decisions about infrastructure.
californiarepublik t1_j8s0kjt wrote
Reply to comment by Yesyesnaaooo in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
First time was HAL 9000.
californiarepublik t1_j8rwbb8 wrote
Reply to comment by NanditoPapa in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
> It used to be a place to read optimism around the tech that would lead to a radical transformation of society.
Optimism is in short supply these days, I think this is more a reflection of reality than anything else.
californiarepublik t1_j8rw6k7 wrote
Reply to comment by tobi117 in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
It hasn't done anything bad YET.
californiarepublik t1_j8izc8a wrote
Reply to comment by 9273629397759992 in New study shows Acceleration of global sea level rise imminent past 1.8℃ planetary warming by 9273629397759992
This estimate seems extremely conservative...? Only 100cm in 130 years?
californiarepublik t1_j764lp9 wrote
Reply to comment by Dumguy1214 in The most important skill of the future is judgment. by warkel
the most important skill of the future is judgement
californiarepublik t1_j7641cn wrote
Reply to comment by Dumguy1214 in The most important skill of the future is judgment. by warkel
they are wrong
californiarepublik t1_j6nel46 wrote
Hilarious that your reasonable, politely-worded post has been downvoted to zero. I agree with you, for this and other reasons, but it doesn't seem a very popular opinion on this sub and I'm not quite sure why. Posters here seem to take delight in the idea of people's jobs being eliminated and Skynet taking over, not sure the appeal. Many fantasize about UBI while forgetting the real 'alignment problem' between elite classes and the rest of society...
californiarepublik t1_j694wuz wrote
Reply to comment by BigZaddyZ3 in Google not releasing MusicLM by Sieventer
I’d rather say that by the time AI ca n do all those things, we’ll have bigger problems than musicians and artists being replaced, at that point AI will be able to do everything better than humans.
californiarepublik t1_j684kzf wrote
Reply to comment by BigZaddyZ3 in Google not releasing MusicLM by Sieventer
> Because… at the moment , making “the best” music still requires some degree of skill and talent. What do you think will happen once we have AI that can generate music better than today’s best artists with a few descriptive text prompts? What happens to the market for music when anyone can generate an entire album full of songs personally tailored to their specific tastes for free with AI? Do you still think people will bother listening to (or financially supporting) music created by other people?
Will this happen before or after my full self-driving Tesla can drive me to work in a snowstorm in New England?
californiarepublik t1_j682la1 wrote
Reply to comment by BigZaddyZ3 in Google not releasing MusicLM by Sieventer
Another point -- using MusicLM to create drumbeats or riffs for an electronic dance track could actually be a MORE creative process for many producers that the ways they are doing it now, since many people are simply sifting through a library of samples to find their basic musical building blocks. Using a text-to-music generator to make your beats instead seems potentially a much more creative process, and personally I will embrace this as a tool in my own music making as soon as its available. I don't see this as replacing my 30 years of education and experience as a musician -- rather -- my background as a musician and artist enables me to get much better use out of AI tools and get the results I want.
californiarepublik t1_j6828h9 wrote
Reply to comment by BigZaddyZ3 in Google not releasing MusicLM by Sieventer
Let me try.
With regard to music, its already very easy to produce formulaic derivative music without AI, you can simply buy all the samples online and snap them together. You can buy vocal a cappellas and use them or hire a studio singer online for cheap.
This has led to a flood of mediocre music ALREADY, we're well down that road, but somehow the best artists still manage to rise the top by creating work that moves people, regardless what tools were used. I believe that this situation will continue well into the future, and AI-art that can replace human artists is still as far off as 100% reliable self-driving cars, another chimera.
californiarepublik t1_j681xzd wrote
Reply to comment by BigZaddyZ3 in Google not releasing MusicLM by Sieventer
r/iamverysmart
californiarepublik t1_j681dvo wrote
Reply to comment by BigZaddyZ3 in Google not releasing MusicLM by Sieventer
The problem with your ideas here is that you have no proof or evidence it will work out this way.
californiarepublik t1_j681ahq wrote
Reply to comment by HelloGoodbyeFriend in Google not releasing MusicLM by Sieventer
I’m a musician too, strongly agree with you.
californiarepublik t1_j6308zo wrote
Reply to comment by Head-Mathematician53 in In case the non physical job apocalypse happens, what will you guys do? by pehnsus
I think there's no one steering the ship. Thinking it's all a big conspiracy is just more copium tbh, pretending that someone is in control even if they're some evil elite.
In reality the world system is too complex to steer like that.
I do recommend watching Adam Curtis' documentary series 'All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace,' it's all about this.
californiarepublik t1_j6300gk wrote
Reply to comment by XagentVFX in In case the non physical job apocalypse happens, what will you guys do? by pehnsus
Why would I want to listen to this tho?
californiarepublik t1_j62yst7 wrote
Reply to comment by Head-Mathematician53 in In case the non physical job apocalypse happens, what will you guys do? by pehnsus
Weed.
californiarepublik t1_j62yojy wrote
Reply to comment by notthebestchristian in In case the non physical job apocalypse happens, what will you guys do? by pehnsus
Yeah Starbucks is a perfect substitute for libraries woo hoo.
californiarepublik t1_j62y54l wrote
FAANG companies just laid off 100,000 tech people so this may not be such a problem soon.
californiarepublik t1_j541jbx wrote
Reply to comment by Quealdlor in Apple AR glasses seem to be postponed to 2025 or possibly even later by Quealdlor
Let that sink in.
californiarepublik t1_jadh1rs wrote
Reply to comment by MonochromeTiger in I Worked on Google's AI. My Fears Are Coming True by Interesting_Mouse730
> The guy was a certified beta tester that doesn't understand the complexity of the many, many ai systems and what they're capable of, or how they work.
Neither do you, as is evident from your post. Just how do you think these systems work anyway, a bunch of hard-coded rules?