bane5454
bane5454 t1_ivt6n8u wrote
Reply to comment by mastelsa in A study found that people perceive that robots are replacing human jobs at a greater rate than they actually are. Only 14% of workers say they’ve had their job replaced by a robot. Workers who had been supplanted by a robot estimated that 47% of all jobs have been lost to robots. by Brave_Cycle_8745
Scary how we came to the same conclusion that those are the only two real paths forward. I’d like to say that feudalism isn’t the more likely of the two, but I’d be lying
bane5454 t1_ivrgd4k wrote
Reply to comment by Infernalism in A study found that people perceive that robots are replacing human jobs at a greater rate than they actually are. Only 14% of workers say they’ve had their job replaced by a robot. Workers who had been supplanted by a robot estimated that 47% of all jobs have been lost to robots. by Brave_Cycle_8745
Hi! I work in automation, and let me tell you, the answer is a resounding “not enough”.
Society is built around working for a wage, so as a result, it’s understandable that there’s a lot of people who are checked out from their jobs and only punch a clock. There’s also a lot of people who ended up replacing someone who was like this and find out painfully quick that they can do the entire job in 15 hours a week or less, but still have to work 40. Society isn’t ready for the level of automation that we have available today, mainly because society would be invariably damaged if automation started to actually replace people’s jobs at the level it’s capable of. I don’t see a future in which there’s both capitalism AND upward social class mobility as a result, but the saving grace for society rn is that most business owners are not automation experts.
That said, I’m confident that most companies could axe 30-40% of their workforce and still perform at the same level if not better, but I’d rather see a world in which automation and improvements in technology actually help all humans by allowing us to reclaim more of our time and lives. Basically, if the new guy can do the same job in 15 hours, let him, and make sure he gets paid the same salary as he would working 40. That’s what I’d like but the opposite is more likely - in 10-20 years, the wave will be at its crest and automation should be cutting down corporate spending by eliminating inefficiencies at an unprecedented rate. What will happen next?
bane5454 t1_iv11ob4 wrote
Reply to comment by deuces_mild in [Image] Reborn. The tree that refused to give up. by Gainsborough-Smythe
Wooden? Inflexible? Stuck in the mud? Tall? Casts a large shadow?
… hard?
bane5454 t1_iv11cn0 wrote
Motivational subreddits are always amusing because of the level of naïveté in every post. Every single one chooses to view the world as this sickly sweet place, but is that really such a bad thing? There’s also comfort in the known, the usual, the mundane. It’s easy to hate on posts like this because it’s just so different from reality, but maybe that’s a good thing. Maybe we all need a bit of a break from the bleak outlook that is the modern day.
bane5454 t1_iu8g8n1 wrote
Reply to comment by cozworthington in Revisiting the great exploding trousers epidemic of the 1930s by marketrent
Not quite today, but… lead in gasoline up til 1995. Also an honorable mention is modern vehicle safety, as the crumple zone in vehicles used to be whatever poor souls happen to be in the car at the time. Head on collision? Hope the passenger doesn’t mind having an engine ejected onto their lap. :/
bane5454 t1_ivuculy wrote
Reply to comment by Studiousskittle in A study found that people perceive that robots are replacing human jobs at a greater rate than they actually are. Only 14% of workers say they’ve had their job replaced by a robot. Workers who had been supplanted by a robot estimated that 47% of all jobs have been lost to robots. by Brave_Cycle_8745
Yes, that’s why I posed this as a question, but the likely outcome is a modern version of surfdom/feudalism, kind of like what happened in the industrial revolution