alexmin93
alexmin93 t1_jdvwpu9 wrote
Reply to comment by Avastor_Neretal in My ChatGPT Chrome Extension that saves conversations in .md files is finally approved by the Chrome Web Store. It's still and so will continue to be Open Source. [P] by ThePogromist
Chatgpt website already feeds it back, that how the model knows what you've asked before. So there's little added value. But I might steal some code to make a poor man's api (aka selenium script to put prompt and click enter).
alexmin93 t1_jdvo0ls wrote
Reply to My ChatGPT Chrome Extension that saves conversations in .md files is finally approved by the Chrome Web Store. It's still and so will continue to be Open Source. [P] by ThePogromist
How can you do it without openai plugin access? Or you mean it just logs the chat into a file and nothing else? Can it provide context to the gpt?
alexmin93 t1_jdvnm53 wrote
Reply to comment by i_am__not_a_robot in My ChatGPT Chrome Extension that saves conversations in .md files is finally approved by the Chrome Web Store. It's still and so will continue to be Open Source. [P] by ThePogromist
It sounds similar to programmer (programist) in russian
alexmin93 t1_jdup63s wrote
Reply to comment by light24bulbs in [P] Using ChatGPT plugins with LLaMA by balthierwings
Do you have GPT-4 API? Afaik plugins run on GPT-4 which even in current state is way better at following formal rules. But it's likely that they've indeed fine tuned it to make decisions to use tools
alexmin93 t1_jduoxj4 wrote
Reply to comment by ThirdMover in [P] Using ChatGPT plugins with LLaMA by balthierwings
The problem is not the model but the training dataset. That's the thing that costs millions for OpenAI. Alpacca is rather poorly performing mostly due to the fact its trained on gtp 3 generated texts
alexmin93 t1_jdmocbw wrote
Reply to [D] I just realised: GPT-4 with image input can interpret any computer screen, any userinterface and any combination of them. by Balance-
The problem is that LLMs aren't capable to make decisions. While GPT-4 can chat almost like a sentient being, it's not sentient at all. It's not able to coprehend the limitations of it's knowledge and capabilities. It's extremely hard to make it call an API to ask for more context. There's no way it will be good at using a computer like a user. It can predict what wappens if you do something but it won't be able to take some action. It's a dataset limitation mostly, it's relatively easy to train language models as there's almost infinite ammount of text on the Internet. But are there any condition-action kind of datasets? You'd need to observe human behavior for millenias (or install some tracker software on thousands of workstations and observe users behavior for years)
alexmin93 t1_jadbgxw wrote
Humans are well adapted to short term stress aka fight or flight response. But we aren't evolved to deal with prolonged stress since reasons causing it don't exist in nature.
alexmin93 t1_j63vh0b wrote
Reply to comment by steruY in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
NATO has better missile defense as well. It can't intercept all or even majority of russian nukes but it shifts balance in NATO balance even more
alexmin93 t1_j63rp6f wrote
Reply to comment by steruY in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
Ofc they have working nukes. The thing is - NATO has more and better nukes.
alexmin93 t1_j63oa6m wrote
Reply to comment by deaconsc in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
So you believe putin's tales about his nuclear Wunderwaffe? With or without nukes, russia loses VS NATO in any scenaro. US has a better alternative to any conventional AND nuclear weapon russia can field.
alexmin93 t1_j63jjlm wrote
Reply to comment by steruY in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
Are you living in Ukraine? If not, what are you worrying about? Russia has no chance against NATO
alexmin93 t1_iu7dmum wrote
Reply to comment by Kromo30 in Best cordless vacuum cleaner: Is Dyson still the winner? by Twi2122
If you really want it to be BIFL you can replace cells yourself. Dyson battery is just a bunch of 18650 or 21700 cells connected to a bms board, replace them with new ones and glue ot back
alexmin93 t1_je31ari wrote
Reply to comment by waiting4myteeth in [D] With ML tools progressing so fast, what are some ways you've taken advantage of them personally? by RedditLovingSun
Are you using some vector knowledge database? If the library is not popular, how can the GPT "know" about it?