aaronroot

aaronroot t1_j6jtohv wrote

Reply to comment by Justinontheinternet in Holyoke mall shooting by runninginsquare_s

I don't expect you're looking for a conversation but I do wonder how it is that you expect incidents/deaths that were prevented from happening due to the existence of laws be accounted for. How can you account for something that never happened?

It seems more like you're noticing that laws don't prevent all crimes. "Do laws against murder prevent murder? Well how come we still have murders?"

1

aaronroot t1_ixg6cmp wrote

Reply to comment by wallet535 in Should the state regulate Internet service pricing similar to utilities? by wallet535

Yeah, tell me about it. I unfortunately live in a place where Comcast is the only “high speed” internet provider available. Nowadays “high speed” doesn’t mean what it did in 2005. It just means, useable internet in 2022. I work from home. Like most people my family streams our entertainment, etc. My other options are literally fucking DSL (there’s 2005 again) or satellite at a fraction of the speed for the same price. It’s a racket and I hate it.

I know this is r/Boston. I don’t live in the metro area or even the east side of the state anymore but we are all victims of this to some degree. Affordable and “high speed” internet access is as much a necessity today as all utilities. It’s not a luxury. Municipalities need to take note, especially if they want to attract residents.

2

aaronroot t1_ixg3h4k wrote

Reply to comment by wallet535 in Should the state regulate Internet service pricing similar to utilities? by wallet535

Damn man, seriously? You must not know anyone in a community that has taken on the project. I, sadly, do not live in a place that has it either so I have worship at the teat of Comcast. My brother lives 20 minutes away in another town with municipal fiber and pays $75/month for gigabit up/down. I pay $125/m to Comcast for 300/10

2