Whatmeworry4
Whatmeworry4 t1_j4rqyel wrote
Reply to comment by Youvebeeneloned in The Mac Pro is now Apple’s last machine with an Intel chip by pecika
It’s probably the most complicated transition and also the least profitable. How much does the Mac Pro contribute to Apple’s bottom line or to increasing overall sales? I would guess it’s a tiny percentage.
Whatmeworry4 t1_j4cfift wrote
Reply to comment by Youdontknowmypickles in The multiverse by Manureofhistory
What is it that implies that the Big Bang created a universe as opposed to a big bang in an already existing universe?
Whatmeworry4 t1_j24v23v wrote
Reply to comment by ConsciousInsurance67 in How the concept: Banality of evil developed by Hanna Arendt can be applied to AI Ethics in order to understand the unintentional behaviour of machines that are intelligent but not conscious. by AndreasRaaskov
I am only referring to the intentionality to seek the consequences. True evil considers the consequences as evil and doesn’t care. The banality of evil is when you don’t consider the consequences as evil. The intent to cause the consequences is the same either way.
Whatmeworry4 t1_j24o6bz wrote
Reply to comment by RegurgitatingFetus in How the concept: Banality of evil developed by Hanna Arendt can be applied to AI Ethics in order to understand the unintentional behaviour of machines that are intelligent but not conscious. by AndreasRaaskov
Ok, the easiest way is to ask if the consequences were intentional, or it may even be documented. Now, why do you ask? Why do we need to detect the intent for the purposes of a theoretical discussion?
Whatmeworry4 t1_j24lhf8 wrote
Reply to comment by ConsciousInsurance67 in How the concept: Banality of evil developed by Hanna Arendt can be applied to AI Ethics in order to understand the unintentional behaviour of machines that are intelligent but not conscious. by AndreasRaaskov
Why do you assume that those consequences are negative for the person acting, or that they care? And how do you separate true ignorance versus willful ignorance?
Whatmeworry4 t1_j24k3s5 wrote
Reply to comment by kfpswf in How the concept: Banality of evil developed by Hanna Arendt can be applied to AI Ethics in order to understand the unintentional behaviour of machines that are intelligent but not conscious. by AndreasRaaskov
I would disagree with her definition because I believe that the banality of evil is what happens when we do understand the full consequences of our actions, and just don’t care enough to change them.
Evil is not a cognitive error unless we are defining it as mental illness or defect. To me, true evil requires intent.
Whatmeworry4 t1_iz1dyof wrote
Reply to Study shows among low-income, predominantly Black neighborhoods, that inexpensive, straightforward abandoned housing remediation was directly linked to significant relative reductions in weapons violations and gun assaults, and suggestive reductions in shootings. by Respawan
Is it that a better environment engendered better behavior or did the criminals move to a different bad environment?
Whatmeworry4 t1_iyfaqmg wrote
Reply to comment by sweetplantveal in Results from a study showed that a computerized simulated-driving program improved ADHD teen driving by reducing the rate of collisions/near-collisions post-training by dark_knight1702
It almost like more practice improves performance.
Whatmeworry4 t1_iyf9agr wrote
Reply to ELI5 why does taking a multi-vitamin on an empty stomach cause nausea, but something like Tylenol doesn’t? by sftysw
It’s possible that the Tylenol has a coating specifically to avoid stomach upset. The vitamin likely isn’t coated and may dissolve faster which is causing you irritation.
Whatmeworry4 t1_iyem8ks wrote
Reply to comment by DaviidRs in In a thousand years, archaeologists will find tanning beds and think we fried people for punishment. by qarasaq
I don’t know about that future. Ever read “A Canticle for Leibowitz”?
Whatmeworry4 t1_iyehphz wrote
Reply to This bench in my city still has an ad for Abduction, starring Taylor Lautner. The movie was released in 2011. by Lolrandomusername3
This movie ad is now Public Service Announcement.
Whatmeworry4 t1_ixtjtmg wrote
“Air breather!”…”Water breather!”…“Air breather!”…”Water breather!”…“Air breather!”…”Water breather!”…
Whatmeworry4 t1_ixsnvjh wrote
I feel like the quote should be, “nothing can beat a real cool hand.”
Whatmeworry4 t1_ixs90jy wrote
This concept has been around a long time; has there been a proof of concept satellite put in space yet?
Whatmeworry4 t1_ixl0o1a wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why couldn't something that says "Cook at 400 degrees for 15 minutes" theoretically be cooked at 6000 degrees for 1 minute? by BitchImLilBaby
Your math is wonky especially using a Fahrenheit scale, but let’s assume that overall heat remains the same but over a different amount of time.
Cooking generally requires that you cook the food all the way through, and the heat takes time to get from the outside of the food to the inside. So if you cook too fast the heat will cook the outside, but never have time to cook the inside before that outside gets over-cooked and burns.
Whatmeworry4 t1_ixkiy9i wrote
The Mary Tyler Moore Show. Almost every main actor went on to their own shows. Valerie Harper, Cloris Leechman, Ed Asner, not to forget Betty White, Gavin McLeod, Ted Knight, and John Amos.
Whatmeworry4 t1_ixkiaop wrote
Barney Miller is one of the most under appreciated shows I’ve come across. Consistently funny.
Whatmeworry4 t1_jccrwf8 wrote
Reply to comment by Gaitle in [IMAGE] Be grateful to how far you've become now by InsideDark_2260
I was over 40 years old, broke, no house, no job, married with an unemployed wife. But we turned it around and life is now better than I thought it could be. Don’t give up.