VikingBorealis
VikingBorealis t1_jdjh3wu wrote
Reply to comment by lost_james in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
Sheesh.
Read the room and down votes kid.
VikingBorealis t1_jdj1rqa wrote
Reply to comment by lost_james in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
Still you
VikingBorealis t1_jdipikb wrote
Reply to comment by lost_james in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
You. Ugly jealousy.
VikingBorealis t1_jdil6pb wrote
Reply to comment by lost_james in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
Are you pretending you weren't being a jealous troll and thinking anyone is buying it?
VikingBorealis t1_jdie0pw wrote
Reply to comment by lost_james in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
Jealousy is an ugly trait.
VikingBorealis t1_ja9zr1w wrote
Reply to My breakfast looked rather racist this morning by nojala
There's some bread stuck on your falukorv there...
VikingBorealis t1_ja9v52r wrote
Reply to comment by Ronny_Jotten in This Hacker Hoodie Uses Surveillance Camera Parts to Blind Surveillance Cameras | The 'Camera Shy Hoodie' renders its wearer anonymous to night vision surveillance cameras, using infrared LEDs usually found in the cameras themselves. by chrisdh79
It's ripped straight from csi and/or criminal minds or something as well. And not a late episode either...
VikingBorealis t1_j81e0bs wrote
Reply to comment by Argon1300 in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
Strangely nonenof that translates to orbit or interplanetary travel...
VikingBorealis t1_j5qvdp7 wrote
Reply to Starlink Is ‘Forced’ To Finally Start Caring About The System’s Light Pollution And Harm To Scientific Research by Albion_Tourgee
Haven't they added light shields and rotated them to not reflect post launch distribution for at least a year, probably more now?
VikingBorealis t1_j48awfi wrote
Reply to comment by synthjunkie in New Razer soundbar uses AI-based head-tracking to beam audio directly to your ears | Soundbar combines AI-based head-tracking, beamforming, and spatial surround by chrisdh79
Tell me you don't kkow what beam forming is.
VikingBorealis t1_j233xkt wrote
Reply to comment by TheGreatestOutdoorz in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
I'm not the one praising news for bring biased. So keep trolling
VikingBorealis t1_j20wl8x wrote
Reply to comment by arcosapphire in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
Are you seriusly trying to claim the headline referring to the specific failure of a specific component is trying to say the wjolenlaunch was a failure just to avoid saying you where wrong.
Well that's your hill to die on. But you clearly see there's a general bias to exaggerating failures of in this example Chinese launches, while western launches are treated technically accurate or even leniency. As your own example show, the word failure isn't used untill they're talking about the specific failed component, not for the launch.
Meanwhile the Chinese launch is a failure despite a successful first stage on a first of its kind rocket testing new tech.
Anyway. You're being purposely obtuse and trolling just to troll and argue at the this point. I'm not sure why, it's no exactly a secret that western news are biased to western achievements...
VikingBorealis t1_j20dq81 wrote
Reply to comment by arcosapphire in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
No I didn't say specifically failure in the title. I said the titles are wired very differently when referring to western vs other launches.
With the Chinese headline the launch is called a failure. NEVER IS the launch referred to as a failure with firefly alpha. You do understand basic grammar enough to see that? They're referring to the specific failure, not calling the launch a failure.
It's not that hard.
VikingBorealis t1_j20d7cw wrote
Reply to comment by BalkothLordofDeath in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
Trolling trolling trolling
Do you understand the massive grammatical different between "firefly alpha failure" and " fireføy alpha launch failure"?
I know the answer, you don't, and if you didn't, you're to much of a redditor to admit you're wrong.
You only need to show your ignorance in one post.
VikingBorealis t1_j20cofh wrote
Reply to comment by BalkothLordofDeath in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
Trolling trolling trolling
Do you understand the massive grammatical different between "firefly alpha failure" and " fireføy alpha launch failure"?
I know the answer, you don't, and if you didn't, you're to much of a redditor to admit you're wrong.
VikingBorealis t1_j20anc5 wrote
Reply to comment by arcosapphire in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
You know very well what I meant which is why you didn't mention it first as well. So stop trolling.
VikingBorealis t1_j20132x wrote
Reply to comment by arcosapphire in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
It's not the primary event in the sentence. It merely specifies what the cause was.
VikingBorealis t1_j1zsp52 wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
Explodes is an event, it's descriptive. It's different from calling something a failure.
VikingBorealis t1_j1zhzjg wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
None of those headlines says "failure"
VikingBorealis t1_j1zdsfs wrote
Reply to comment by goibnu in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
Early test rockets often pro ide red use pricing for payloads. Some risk the high chance of a failed launch for the reduced cost.
So it really isn't. If it had been a commercial payload on a reliable well tested rocket, yeah, but it wasn't.
VikingBorealis t1_j1z64tu wrote
Reply to comment by otter111a in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
Also old and established technology, that wasn't very good to start with.
It's mostly truenwith developing and new rockets and technology.
Spaceship ha st had a single test flight that hasn't ended in a spectacular fireball. But also lot a single "failure". All but the last was expected to explode, the last wasn't unexpected either.
VikingBorealis t1_j1yeqhi wrote
Reply to comment by to_glory_we_steer in Historic first launch of Chinese private methane-fueled rocket ends in failure by returnofjuju
A launch is never a failure, only a failure to launch, especially on new hardware.
Funny to compare this heading to headings of exactly the same thing with new western rockets though.
VikingBorealis t1_ixu43xl wrote
Reply to comment by misterhamtastic in Covering a cylinder with a magnetic coil triples its energy output in nuclear fusion test by Gari_305
Yet steam engines are one of the most effective methods of gaining energy.
VikingBorealis t1_ixs2u9b wrote
Reply to comment by crolansolo in [OC] A new/unused SEGA Mark III from 1985. The Japanese SEGA Master System.. by DivOveR
And?
It wasn't sealed, the box is an open ended tube, it's been opened multiple times before.
And even so. It's a piece of electronics. It should be plugged in an used if you could find something to use it with.
VikingBorealis t1_je6ewbt wrote
Reply to Sacrifices by TryingTimesComics
No up don't. But reality isn't as funny.