SuicidalGuidedog

SuicidalGuidedog t1_je9nguf wrote

Reply to comment by Briggykins in TIL a special law in the UK was created to ensure that the Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital will forever be able to collect royalties from stage performances, audiobooks, book releases, etc. of Peter Pan in the UK. This is the only work with an 'exception' to copyright laws. by [deleted]

Working in an office next to Great Ormond St has saved me literally thousands in cab fares.

277

SuicidalGuidedog t1_j36usm7 wrote

Reply to TIL of execution by Breaking Wheel that would start with tying the body to a wheel, breaking the bones of the limbs, braiding the broken limbs through the spokes and leaving the body to be eaten by scavenging animals and birds. by muadib1974

It feels a lot like the wheel is superfluous to this execution. My final words would probably be "sure, I mean it hurts, but why call it a Breaking Wheel? You could have broken my limbs and tied them to just about anything... hey, come back, I'm not done berating you."

107

SuicidalGuidedog t1_ixxutkf wrote

Reply to comment by SG_wormsblink in TIL Singapore’s constitution requires the President to have experience as a minister - or as CEO of a large, profitable company. by ltdanhasnolegs

The previous answer is still accurate for an answer to the original question, based on your link. The policy is not retro-active so she would (should) have inherited her father's Indian race (according to the archaic Singaporian policy). Even those born after this 2011 policy change are still only allowed one race - the double barrel option doesn't change that. From your source "For relevant Government policies, such as the initial assignment to a mother-tongue language class in schools and the HDB’s Ethnic Integration Policy, the first component of a double-barrelled race will be used."

0

SuicidalGuidedog t1_ixxtr3m wrote

Reply to comment by rab777hp in TIL Singapore’s constitution requires the President to have experience as a minister - or as CEO of a large, profitable company. by ltdanhasnolegs

A democracy isn't defined by changing government. It's defined by a system of government by the will of the people. Generally most people agree that 'democracy' is shorthand for 'representative democracy' whereby most people can vote freely and fairly (I say mostly because even the most democratic country doesn't let children vote). There are opposition parties and regular elections in Singapore so by that standard it's a democracy.

That being said, I don't think it counts as a logical democracy. Just not for the same reason you quoted above. A single party being repeatedly elected doesn't, on its own, prove a place to be undemocratic.

4

SuicidalGuidedog t1_ixavnkc wrote

Reply to comment by InfernalCorg in TIL that in 2003, scientists "resurrected" an extinct species of Ibex, bringing back one living specimen, only for it go extinct again seven minutes later when the specimen died of a lung defect by mausoliam95

The phrase "failure to adapt and compete" is rather facile in this context. I mean, sure, it's true, but to what end? It's essentially placing the blame on the victim of extinction. It's the equivalent of cutting down a jungle and then when a tiger walks out you shoot it in the face and shrug "I guess he failed to adapt". Yeah, to the actions that we all took.

I'd argue it's more valuable to just say that we're clearly damaging our own environment and causing the shockingly fast extinction of multiple flora and fauna. When you get to the stage we humans have of having this level of control on our environment, it's no longer the case where other species need to adapt.

1

SuicidalGuidedog t1_ixauovq wrote

Reply to comment by Actiaeon in TIL that in 2003, scientists "resurrected" an extinct species of Ibex, bringing back one living specimen, only for it go extinct again seven minutes later when the specimen died of a lung defect by mausoliam95

I agree. While that's true, I didn't want to give someone the ability to question some 'natural' extinctions. Human mechanisation has vastly increased the speed of extinction. For example, Aboriginal Australians possibly hunted the Diprotodon to extinction, but that type of thing is just a curious anecdote. Real extinction is directly due to hunting with guns and removing habitat at an industrial level.

But I take your point and don't disagree.

9

SuicidalGuidedog t1_ita1kwg wrote

Reply to TIL that in 2005 burglars stole $71.6 million from a bank in Fortaleza, Brazil by setting up a fake landscaping company near the bank and digging a 256ft tunnel beneath two city blocks to the bank over 3 months. Neighbors noticed vanloads of soil removed daily but assumed it was business-related. by Lagavulin16_neat

And ya'll think Colin Furze is just a YouTuber. He's basically just doing educational videos for criminals.

11

SuicidalGuidedog t1_iss4b1q wrote

Reply to comment by SchillMcGuffin in TIL about some US Marine named Charles Brown who received the Medal of Honor in 1872, but deserted in Shanghai before he could receive it. by dragoniteftw33

There's definitely been an increase in the requirements to be awarded the Medal of Honor. I believe there was a "clean up" of about a thousand names when they removed awards that were considered 'unworthy'. People like Buffalo Bill had his taken away (although posthumously reinstated in the 1980s).

To put it in context, there have been 3,530 medals awarded and 1,523 were during the Civil War. That's more than the entire 20th Century combined.

If you want some really questionable awards for the Medal of Honor I'd start with the Battle of Veracruz. It triggered a new way of looking at medals in general and is broadly considered a turning point for the Medal of Honor.

9