SquashedKiwifruit
SquashedKiwifruit t1_j9xkcxv wrote
Reply to comment by IMind in Google making ‘terrible mistake’ in blocking Canadian news: Trudeau by Defiant_Race_7544
I don't understand this law really.
Where sites like Facebook are taking elements of the content, and displaying it to users, in a manner which means they won't go to the news website (so the news website has no chance of making revenue / displaying an ad / getting a new sign up. For example, a post which contains a headline and a summary of its content (not just the first line). Then yes Facebook/Google/Whoever should pay.
But if the site is doing nothing more than showing a link to the news article in search results, with perhaps at most one sentence which is just the first few words of the article. That encourages users to access the website to read more, and is favourable to the news site. Google should not pay for that. That is driving people to the news website, where they can show ads to users.
Reading this article - it sounds like they are wanting them to pay for search results (correct me if I am wrong?). If that is the case I don't blame google, that seems ridiculous.
SquashedKiwifruit t1_j65tn0b wrote
Sounds like they should stop purchasing arms from the Swiss.
SquashedKiwifruit t1_itpgmp9 wrote
Reply to comment by Kai_ESR in As Hungary Decries EU Sanctions, Ukraine Says Without It, Russian Tanks Will Reach Budapest by Heavy-Ad6366
I’m sure they could find a way if they tried.
SquashedKiwifruit t1_itpeuu9 wrote
Reply to As Hungary Decries EU Sanctions, Ukraine Says Without It, Russian Tanks Will Reach Budapest by Heavy-Ad6366
It’s time Hungary was removed from the EU, and NATO. They are a liability to both.
SquashedKiwifruit t1_ja0s255 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Google making ‘terrible mistake’ in blocking Canadian news: Trudeau by Defiant_Race_7544
That response doesn’t really make sense to me because a person using a search engine is searching for something.
To the extent they are looking for news, they just already know about it so it suggests they are looking for further reading. You wouldn’t search for headlines about something you already know of surely?
If they don’t click through it must not have been of interest?
It seems to me that if they were going to have to pay for the item merely being listed, irrespective of if someone interacted with it, then if I was google I simply wouldn’t show that content in search results either.
Now if google was summarising the content beyond just the headline - I would agree with you. They should pay because they are taking the content and summarising it so a person wouldnt need to read it. But that doesn’t seem to be the case?
Facebook and reddit is a little different because unlike google there is an interactive forum. So the comments usually do summarise the content.