SplinterPizza

SplinterPizza t1_iuiocdo wrote

>The thing has access to the host's memories and instincts and uses them to perfectly imitate the host. I disagree that it's building a functional simulation of the host's consciousness to do that

Sure but the point is we only know what the film shows us. And it's pretty clear the what it mimics is a perfect representation of a human. It has the memories of the person it devours. Now for the extrapolation on that, If it's mimicking down to the Neurons then it stands to reason it can mimic the mind of the person.

It understands what a noose is. It understands what Alcohol tastes like. The characters in the film make a salient point that maybe you wouldn't even know you were a mimic.

3

SplinterPizza t1_iuilal8 wrote

>Maybe while it's copying someone, it's exactly copying everything, knows what they know, but once it changes, it can no longer remember that version of itself because it's no longer structured that way

We can only go off what the film shows us.

And nothing suggests this in the film. It's relatively straight forward. It's perfect doppelgangers. Once they find out who is the Thing it doesn't make sense for it to switch back to that disguise.

1

SplinterPizza t1_iuikh2r wrote

>indeed having that conversation with a being that doesn't even understand what a noose is.

Where does this line of thinking come from? You see this kind of logic to justify all sorts of fan theories in the The Thing... But literally nothing could possibly suggest that.

The creature can perfectly mimic humans down to their DNA. It clearly has their thoughts, memories, etc. For all we know when it's in Human form it might still retain the actual consciousness of the person it's replicated. Meaning they don't even know they're the Thing.

What we do know is the film shows us that it's a perfect replica of a person down to the mannerisms. It understands what a noose is. It understands what alcohol tastes like.

2