OfCourse4726

OfCourse4726 t1_j6g9xj6 wrote

yes except the copyright system was created without ai in mind. ai would break the system. like i said, companies could with a super computer generate so much art that it would just flood the system with copyrights. a human artist could end up accidentally infringing all the time and thereby freezing their capacity to create original works. then there are also issues with likeness. if ai creates a human face, do real humans with that face get a royalty? how much alike to that face would it need to be? how come celebrity lookalikes don't get royalties? some of them are 99% alike.

10

OfCourse4726 OP t1_j1tf3fu wrote

no it's not. i wish it was because the trailer and advertising made it seemed so. i guess i'll give it one more try since i havent seen it in years though. also have you seen borgia season 3? it seems it might've come years after season 2 and in america there was virtually no advertising for it. i didnt even see it back when it came out and i watched season 1 and 2 when it came out. if you love tv shows, you need to watch borgia season 3. trust me.

2

OfCourse4726 OP t1_j1tevgd wrote

rome season 1 was so perfect that it was nearly impossible to surpass it. i dont know how writers for season 1 could possibly have made season 2 so bad no matter what they had to work with. you should watch borgia season 3. it might've come years after season 2 or something because i watched borgia when it came out and do not recall at all anything about season 3 when i watched it again just now. it really is incredibly good.

1

OfCourse4726 OP t1_j1tb9uy wrote

are you talking about borgia or the borgias? borgia is the good one, the borgias on showtime is bad. anyways, i am comparing it to game of thrones because of the insane political intrigue and schemes. borgia is better because it did happen in real life. the motivations and outcomes in borgia are of course more realistic and that's why it's better.

−34