Nibb31
Nibb31 t1_ja92nzf wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in Could the international space station be repurposed as an interplanetary vessel, a La For All Mankind? by -Major-Arcana-
The advantage of For All Mankind spacecraft is that none of them has any cooling system at all. Vital components such as antennas, solar panels, or radiators don't exist in the FAM universe. Some ships don't even carry fuel, which is quite convenient also.
Nibb31 t1_j25gqz3 wrote
Reply to comment by Icy-Conclusion-3500 in Lunar Gateway for Dummies? by Significant_Youth_73
SpaceX operations, including NASA HLS, rely on orbital refueling from Starship tankers.
Once that is up and running, there isn't much advantage in producing rocket fuel on the Moon.
Nibb31 t1_j2462o8 wrote
Reply to comment by Icy-Conclusion-3500 in Lunar Gateway for Dummies? by Significant_Youth_73
>I believe it’s not just a staging point for lunar missions, but missions to mars and beyond as well.
That doesn't make much sense. If you are going from LEO to Mars, then going to the Moon is a detour that you don't need.
If SpaceX manages to handle orbital refueling the way they need to to get to the Moon, then there is no point in refueling at the Lunar Gateway to go to Mars.
Nibb31 t1_j245mp4 wrote
Reply to Lunar Gateway for Dummies? by Significant_Youth_73
The point of the LG is to give something for SLS to do.
SLS isn't capable of sending all-up Apollo-style lunar mission with a crew module and a lander. So the lander needs to be sent separately. Therefore you need somewhere for the lander to dock, and since it's reusable, to refuel. Therefore, a Lunar Gateway.
If NASA had decided to build a rocket around a mission, instead of figuring out a mission to fit the rocket, then none of this would have been necessary.
Nibb31 t1_ixry91h wrote
Reply to comment by as_a_fake in Orion snaps 'selfie' with the Moon as it prepares for distant retrograde orbit | Insertion burn scheduled to take place today then engineers have six days to see how spacecraft fares in deep space by chrisdh79
Not even that. The Orion capsule is gutted and some of the stuff inside can be reused. The capsule itself is disposable.
Nibb31 t1_is6yqe4 wrote
Reply to comment by OrbitalClassWhale in Now that commercial space flight is in the works, if you had the money, would you go? by Ariolet
The difference being the price of the ticket.
Nibb31 t1_is5kiuc wrote
Reply to comment by LordCountDuckula in Now that commercial space flight is in the works, if you had the money, would you go? by Ariolet
Bezos relieves your overview-effect trauma by spraying champagne on you.
Nibb31 t1_is4xp5l wrote
Reply to Now that commercial space flight is in the works, if you had the money, would you go? by Ariolet
I would want to at least go to orbit, not on a Bezos or Branson suborbital joyride that only lasts a couple of minutes. I also probably wouldn't sell my house to do it.
I do plan on booking a seat on a Zero-G flight one day though. They are around €7000, so definitely more affordable.
Nibb31 t1_ja94oev wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in Could the international space station be repurposed as an interplanetary vessel, a La For All Mankind? by -Major-Arcana-
All spacecraft need radiators because their systems generate heat and you need some way to shed that heat into space. Since convection and ventilation don't work in a vacuum, the only method is radiation.
The need for massive radiators is even greater if you are using nuclear rockets, as those generate massive amounts of heat.