Ne_Nel
Ne_Nel t1_j8t31pi wrote
Reply to comment by Kafke in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
Lol. I was using it for half an hour, testing information about my country and then asking for a summary of articles. I don't even remember the number of lies, fabricated links and false summaries that it gave me. A real disaster.
Ne_Nel t1_j8qw2uv wrote
Reply to comment by Kafke in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
And tons, i mean TONS of fake info.
Ne_Nel t1_j7i67yp wrote
Reply to comment by GusPlus in [N] Getty Images sues AI art generator Stable Diffusion in the US for copyright infringement by Wiskkey
What are you talking about? The dataset is open source and there are thousands of Getty images. That isn't the discussion here.
Ne_Nel t1_j7i4u96 wrote
Reply to comment by GusPlus in [N] Getty Images sues AI art generator Stable Diffusion in the US for copyright infringement by Wiskkey
Thats not much smarter than that comment tbh.
Ne_Nel t1_j6va0z6 wrote
Pixel vs Latent.
Ne_Nel t1_j6djktq wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [R] InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructions by Illustrious_Row_9971
Now art will be more concept than skill based. That means a lot more people having the chance to expand their creativity. Yes, such an horrible thing. /s
Ne_Nel t1_j65iapb wrote
Reply to comment by firem1ndr in Asking here and not on an artist subreddit because you guys are non-artists who love AI and I don't want to get coddled. Genuinely, is there any point in continuing to make art when everything artists could ever do will be fundamentally replaceable in a few years? by [deleted]
I explicitly spoke of the concept of art in a social way. Each individual can consider art what he wants. For you a drawing of a bird is art, but that is only your opinion. The truth is that a drawing is not art, its just a drawing. If that doesn't convey anything to others, what you think is irrelevant.
In the end, the point is that you can't decide for others what is art. It is decided by collective consensus of each culture. That is what you must refute if you want to say that my approach is wrong. Which is not objectively possible, unless you can break the freedom of human thought.
Ne_Nel t1_j64kegm wrote
Reply to comment by firem1ndr in Asking here and not on an artist subreddit because you guys are non-artists who love AI and I don't want to get coddled. Genuinely, is there any point in continuing to make art when everything artists could ever do will be fundamentally replaceable in a few years? by [deleted]
Art is not made by you, art is ""made"" by people when they consider it art. If many people see in the human artistic styles inspired and the concept devised by the user enough artistic value and meaning, it will be considered art in that society. It is not up to you or me to decide that.
Ne_Nel t1_j64jrlp wrote
Reply to comment by Rhaegar003 in Asking here and not on an artist subreddit because you guys are non-artists who love AI and I don't want to get coddled. Genuinely, is there any point in continuing to make art when everything artists could ever do will be fundamentally replaceable in a few years? by [deleted]
Imperfections are no less a thing than any other thing in a piece, and learn things is what AI is good at. Just say.
Ne_Nel t1_j64i6mw wrote
Reply to comment by ipatimo in Asking here and not on an artist subreddit because you guys are non-artists who love AI and I don't want to get coddled. Genuinely, is there any point in continuing to make art when everything artists could ever do will be fundamentally replaceable in a few years? by [deleted]
This.
Ne_Nel t1_j27uvl5 wrote
Reply to comment by AvgAIbot in For those of you who expect AI progress to slow next year: by Foundation12a
Basically, memory tech. CPU has improved thousands last decades, but DRAM only 30x in the same period. And train needs tons of it. We are working on several ideas to walk around, but the exponential grow haven't a clean path at all for now.
Ne_Nel t1_j27uk24 wrote
Reply to comment by SurroundSwimming3494 in For those of you who expect AI progress to slow next year: by Foundation12a
I saw a chart of standard AI vs New method (arrived 2018). Old methods 8x/2year. New method 240x/2year. Maybe isn’t such a crazy statement.
Ne_Nel t1_j1p6lqb wrote
Reply to comment by Ok_Homework9290 in What sector are we going to see a big "anti" movement in next after art? by Crush4885
All he mentioned. Also, everything he said is art related. Suddenly people believe that art is moving a pencil and those who do it carry human art behind.
Ne_Nel t1_j1p04zc wrote
Reply to comment by Awkward-Skill-6029 in What sector are we going to see a big "anti" movement in next after art? by Crush4885
"Singers" were already replaced long ago. And now, anyone would be able to sound like any good singer, probably in real time too. And let me doubt if new AI VSingers wouldn't be liked as real ones soon (Hatsune miku on steroids).
Ne_Nel t1_j1ozshz wrote
✔️All
Ne_Nel t1_j1fhmpd wrote
Reply to If your opinion is "it's good because it's AI," you're not really thinking very far ahead. by OldWorldRevival
✔️Arbitrarily generalizing what people do and why.
✔️Speak from a position of moral and intellectual superiority.
âś…Congratulations. This post has passed the human check.
Ne_Nel t1_j1a753h wrote
Reply to Will we run out of data? by visarga
Isn't AI supposed to be a big data generator? How could you be out of data with something that grow exponentially at make just that.
Ne_Nel t1_jef9c3d wrote
Reply to What if it's just chat bot infatuation and were overhyping what is just a super big chat bot? by Arowx
🤦‍♂️