Ne_Nel

Ne_Nel t1_j65iapb wrote

I explicitly spoke of the concept of art in a social way. Each individual can consider art what he wants. For you a drawing of a bird is art, but that is only your opinion. The truth is that a drawing is not art, its just a drawing. If that doesn't convey anything to others, what you think is irrelevant.

In the end, the point is that you can't decide for others what is art. It is decided by collective consensus of each culture. That is what you must refute if you want to say that my approach is wrong. Which is not objectively possible, unless you can break the freedom of human thought.

1

Ne_Nel t1_j64kegm wrote

Art is not made by you, art is ""made"" by people when they consider it art. If many people see in the human artistic styles inspired and the concept devised by the user enough artistic value and meaning, it will be considered art in that society. It is not up to you or me to decide that.

0

Ne_Nel t1_j1a753h wrote

Isn't AI supposed to be a big data generator? How could you be out of data with something that grow exponentially at make just that.

2