Mrpgal14
Mrpgal14 t1_j57qc0m wrote
Reply to comment by Mercantilean in This is currently an anti-trans bill sitting in our house at the moment, and frankly, I don’t see enough people talking about it. by Jtagz
The major pediatric association in the country disagrees with you
Mrpgal14 t1_j44maue wrote
Reply to comment by averageduder in New Hampshire Trans Sanctuary Bill (plus two others) by 1carus_x
Source: “Trust me bro”
Mrpgal14 t1_j44l45s wrote
Reply to comment by Kekwexpress in New Hampshire Trans Sanctuary Bill (plus two others) by 1carus_x
OP replied well already but also just to state clearly, even if those things were uncommon abnormalities they should still be accounted for in the wording of the law to avoid any problems that ambiguity might cause. Laws shouldn’t be “pretty obvious” they should be crystal clear so certainly groups aren’t unfairly exempt, or worse so that the government doesn’t use that ambiguity to persecute whomever they see fit.
Mrpgal14 t1_j57rhf1 wrote
Reply to comment by Mercantilean in This is currently an anti-trans bill sitting in our house at the moment, and frankly, I don’t see enough people talking about it. by Jtagz
They disagree that it’s not a choice, they recommend puberty blockers for trans children, the settled science is that it’s an effective form of treatment.