MercuriusExMachina
MercuriusExMachina t1_j17youu wrote
Reply to comment by PrinceOfLies0 in Are we already in the midst of a singularity? by oldmanhero
Even the raw version of GPT-3 from 2020 was better than most priests at being priest.
MercuriusExMachina t1_izwii06 wrote
Reply to comment by IronJackk in AGI will not precede Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) - They will arrive simultaneously by __ingeniare__
Hm, this is a really interesting take.
MercuriusExMachina t1_iu904ni wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in If you were performing a Turing test to a super advanced AI, which kind of conversations or questions would you try to know if you are chatting with a human or an AI? by Roubbes
Wow, that paper on simulating people is awesome. I was saying from the beginning that these large language models are not beings, but more like worlds where various beings can be summoned.
I think that if you do personality tests, with no prompting at all, you can get some interesting stats.
MercuriusExMachina t1_iu859av wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in If you were performing a Turing test to a super advanced AI, which kind of conversations or questions would you try to know if you are chatting with a human or an AI? by Roubbes
This can lead to the idea that artificial general super intelligence might include systems that are better than us at being human.
MercuriusExMachina t1_iu7vs2b wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in If you were performing a Turing test to a super advanced AI, which kind of conversations or questions would you try to know if you are chatting with a human or an AI? by Roubbes
Yeah, it's way better then the average response, so it kind of fails the test by being too good.
MercuriusExMachina t1_iu7vgah wrote
Reply to comment by Ortus12 in If you were performing a Turing test to a super advanced AI, which kind of conversations or questions would you try to know if you are chatting with a human or an AI? by Roubbes
Lol, that's a good one!
MercuriusExMachina t1_isagg3u wrote
Reply to comment by MuzZzel in How long have you been on the Singularity subreddit? by TheHamsterSandwich
2 or 3 more years and we'll see.
We already know the architecture for AGI (the Transformer), so for now we just scale it up.
The scaling hypothesis has not been falsified so far.
MercuriusExMachina t1_is0j1lc wrote
I've been around here since 2017 or so. I have became more optimistic.
Since then, I have been predicting ASI for 2025.
But back then in 2017 I felt that 2025 is super optimistic, now it feels super conservative.
MercuriusExMachina t1_irjy40o wrote
Reply to comment by DungeonsAndDradis in When do you think we'll have AGI, if at all? by intergalacticskyline
Now that's an AI expert...
MercuriusExMachina t1_irjxtx5 wrote
Reply to comment by Smoke-away in When do you think we'll have AGI, if at all? by intergalacticskyline
I agree with most of what you say, but please note that one key difference between diffusion models and language models is size, so compute costs. Diffusion models are really tiny compared to language models.
MercuriusExMachina t1_ir6wnx0 wrote
Reply to comment by whenhaveiever in "The number of AI papers on arXiv per month grows exponentially with doubling rate of 24 months." by Smoke-away
Exactly. The bitter lesson would seem to indicate that compute is the determining factor, not algorithmic innovation.
But it's good to see that research is keeping up with compute.
MercuriusExMachina t1_iqx2aqv wrote
Reply to comment by 2Punx2Furious in Large Language Models Can Self-improve by Dr_Singularity
ASI 2022 woohoo + happy cake day!
MercuriusExMachina t1_j17z756 wrote
Reply to comment by wntersnw in Her - (2013 film) | are we fast approaching this for AI romances? by Snipgan
Daily fine-tuning