Matshelge

Matshelge t1_j7jk7t9 wrote

So what is the result you want? A machine that can tell your age, or a machine that understands that age is just a number?

The reason it ended up like this was that we did not currate the input to give an output that fit ideal output.

It's not garbage data, it's human data. Maybe humans are garbage, but just wait till it starts touching more human taste and preferences, like intelligence or beauty. We will get real mad at those results.

8

Matshelge t1_j1twhid wrote

Reply to comment by StreetBookRandoNumbr in AI and education by lenhoi

This is a misunderstanding of what the Turing test really is for.

The test is not about when an AI becomes sentient, but at what point we can't tell anymore. And we are long past that second part.

The problem coming now is that when a sentient AI comes along, there will still be those that say "nono, we know how it works" and we end up in a Westworld scenario.

6

Matshelge t1_iud3yx3 wrote

There is a root problem with all these worries, that also comes up in most future problems projections (gray goo, human mind uploading etc).

If we come to a point where we can change someone DNA with a injection, and this ejection can continue on in the germ line. We have the technology to change it back again, because it's the same technology we used to cause the problem.

Everyone fear mongers in the idea that the scenario happens now to someone, and everyone else is stuck with our current technology.

4