I read it. It's a nothing piece other than to say oh look millions want this new ad Spyware on their computer!

Of course, it's positive. It's a puff piece to get people to be okay with better marketing tailored to sound as human as possible. The problem is that people basically have created an information bubble around themselves. Not because the information isn't available, but because the first results they see are pre-filtered for them. What you see as a search result is going to be different than what I see. That makes it easier for half truths and outright lies to spread. Better ai is going to make it worse. That's if there isn't some sort of eu take on privacy in adopted.

But my point is, why is this a problem when basically a less advanced form of data collection and use is already being done? Public outrage should have already taken place if people cared. I don't think people will move to block this. They may feign outrage then use it anyway. I don't see what is going to get folks to really fight especially since it will be better at disguising the "ai" part in a response.

Tell me how current algos are not giving curated ads already? What does putting AI in front of it add? Other than a more clickbaity title.

Rate hikes need to be increased not slowed down. That's not a supply problem. Thats a protecting stocks instead of people problem.

Who's y'all? Right now there is a lot of bracing for a recession, but it's not really going deep enough. Just waiting for people to get unemployed is not a great plan.

What I mean by ripping the band aid off, is the policy now is causing a slowing that only benefits those with enough cushion to survive higher inflation slowing down over time instead of a spike all at once. People who think slowing the economy is better for the masses probably aren't living paycheck to paycheck or think the stock market is the economy.

It's kind of a worse case scenario. A long slow bleed instead of ripping the band aid off is a possibility now.

Position or ban