Longtermthrowaway5

Longtermthrowaway5 t1_jefj0hj wrote

That's what I'm saying, what if it's an emergency and they don't got a phone, or need more immediate assistance? Are you gonna answer the door? Is acting frantic and and loud going to make you more likely to answer the door then?

And regarding the second point, if you had left your headlights on or had some issue that wasn't an emergency, you wouldn't want to be informed of it?

1

Longtermthrowaway5 t1_jed6wgq wrote

Is that the most easily identifiable? There's tons of black people. It does relatively little to narrow the pool. Their clothing would be more identifiable. And it's not just the number of people impersonating PSE&G. You also gotta factor in actual PSEG employees going around.

−4

Longtermthrowaway5 t1_jecxdzh wrote

You know it really comes off the wrong way when the only identifying information you provided is that they are black.

You can also provide approximate height, what they were wearing, their gender. Tattoos? Any accents? What good is your warning going to do other than to be weary of all black people that say they are from PSE&G, which is every black PSE&G employee

−5

Longtermthrowaway5 t1_je8pr1n wrote

Lol really? I'm dying to be able to go to the shoreline weekend and a great sculpture garden the next. That's the reason to move to NJ. You got so many cultural and recreational amenities within easy reach. The only noticible gap in recreation is truly great remote nature type recreation.

5

Longtermthrowaway5 t1_jdng3ul wrote

It's land just like any other land that can be owned. And a lot of things can be attractive. A cool climbing tree can be a natural attraction. Does that mean we should be able to go on anyone's property to climb their tree, or see some flowers on it, or go fly kites on their grass patch?

If you want to argue for abolishing private property completely, fair enough, but beach front property works just the same as any other property.

−2