JackMitcham

JackMitcham t1_ixk4n9r wrote

> Is it that hard to believe that just because you love something others don't?

You're the one who is claiming she's not funny and is surprised anybody else does.

> I watched it and thought it was very average

Then you admit she's a comedian. This directly contradicts what you said earlier.

>I'm not saying she is bad

You literally implied that she was not a comedian at all.

Keep moving those goalposts.

3

JackMitcham t1_ix7vuk3 wrote

Neat, but I doubt it'll have much of an impact on the daily lives of quadriplegics. My sister is a C4 complete quad (no movement below shoulders) and can drive very well with a shoulder button and head array. She was able to learn how to do it much faster than this study seems to indicate, and even in this study, one participant never got it.

11

JackMitcham t1_irrh3eb wrote

> No idea what Trump's lawyers have to do with this conversation. > >

YOU ASKED which lawyers are making this case in court.

>she stated she was told by law enforcement many years later that it was legal.

Yeah, when she tried reporting the crime. You don't have a problem with that?

>on your idiotic comments.

Enjoy the ban, I guess.

2

JackMitcham t1_irrb96p wrote

>What lawyers?

Many lawyers. Trump's lawyers, for one.

>What case?

The case that one cannot rape one's spouse. I was very clear in my original post, I don't know why you're confused.

>What rapist is getting arrested?

None, that's the point.

>Her ex-husband?

I mean, yeah. She literally said she was raped. What is confusing you? Jesus Christ man, pay attention.

0

JackMitcham t1_irr1q4h wrote

> It is in our best interest to know where this guy is. It’s in the best interest of our families, friends, their families and friends

Cool, the article doesn't give this information. And it's in a national news outlet, not a local one.

>Serial rapists don’t get “cured” or “reformed” by anything. They’ll rape again.

You have zero evidence that there is a 100% recidivism rate for rapists. I looked it up to be sure, and you're not even remotely close.

−22

JackMitcham t1_irqx270 wrote

> You don't think it might be of interest to someone to know if this guy moved into their neighborhood?

That information is not given in the article. They're not listing where he's moving to.

>Would you want to know who this guy was if you were a young woman or had a teenage daughter?

I don't see how knowing that this guy exists matters at all, especially as a national news story, not a local one.

Can you give me a good reason why someone in Pensacola, FL should care about this?

−3