That’s certainly the reason it hasn’t been released. Meanwhile, “look over there….it’s a spy balloon!”

But the flight logs and the client list are different things. What they are hiding is the client list. Epstein and Maxwell were charged with essentially pimping underage girls, but who did they pimp them out to? That list of clients of powerful people is a secret to this day. We know there was one member of the British Royal Family but where are the rest of the names?

The flight logs just says who was on his jet. That doesn't mean they had sex with any of the minors. What we want to see is the client list.

"gay" because it would be misleading to imply that a man and woman raped and sold their children to a pack of pedophiles. Without knowing that these are two men, you wouldn't understand why reddit would censor the story. If it were a married man and woman doing this, reddit wouldn't care that people heard about it.

Here is one from NPC News.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna41917

Sources? This is a fucking court case. The NY Post has the actual public documents from the case.

> Also, WTF is "gay married to each other"? Don't you mean butt buddies or something?

Did you read the articles? Two men. Married to each other. Large donors to the Democrat Party. Adopted children to rape and sell them to other men.

That's probably because reddit was censoring the story when it happened. Plus, a lot of media outlets barely reported on it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11658079/Gay-Atlanta-couple-charged-raping-adopted-sons-pimped-local-pedophiles.html

https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgia-couple-accused-sexually-abusing-adopted-boys-husband-bragged-molesting-son

https://nypost.com/2023/01/20/couple-pimped-their-adopted-sons-out-to-pedophile-ring-report/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11658079/Gay-Atlanta-couple-charged-raping-adopted-sons-pimped-local-pedophiles.html

https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgia-couple-accused-sexually-abusing-adopted-boys-husband-bragged-molesting-son

https://nypost.com/2023/01/20/couple-pimped-their-adopted-sons-out-to-pedophile-ring-report/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11658079/Gay-Atlanta-couple-charged-raping-adopted-sons-pimped-local-pedophiles.html

https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgia-couple-accused-sexually-abusing-adopted-boys-husband-bragged-molesting-son

https://nypost.com/2023/01/20/couple-pimped-their-adopted-sons-out-to-pedophile-ring-report/

For a white, reddit was censoring this story. It seems like they are allowing links to the story now that enough time has past.

> Feldman isn’t protecting anyone or fearing for his life,

Wait what? You talking about the couple who raped their adopted children in Atlanta or are you talking about reddit? Or are you talking about Epstein?

Meanwhile, Jeffrey Epstein's client list is still hidden. This isn't anything new and Cory Feldman is not the most egregious example of protecting pedophiles who happen to be powerful. Two mega donors to the Democrat party from Atlanta were caught molesting and having sex with their adopted children and Reddit censored the story under the guise of "hate speech" (because the pedophiles were gay married to each other). This happens all of the time.

> It’s funny how you right wing dill holes don’t consider the fact that private companies can have any fucking policy they want

You remember that as Elon continues to remake Twitter into a free speech platform. You leftist ball sacks hate nothing more than free speech and letting people express themselves how they see fit.

>During an interview with CNN's Brian Stelter,

The disgraced CNN anchor?

>Lorenz defended her story as being newsworthy and that Libs of TikTok should be publicly identified.

And what she said is completely ridiculous. This lady was a private citizen who did nothing but retweet publicly available tiktoks to amplify their reach. Meanwhile, Taylor Lorenz is a public figure who thinks that her public tweets shouldn't be archived. Can't you comprehend the irony of that?

> ". . . .If the author or publisher of some part of the Archive does not want his or her work in the Wayback Machine, then we may remove that portion from Wayback Machine without notice."

Listen, you smooth brained troglodyte, the company said "we may" but didn't provide their policy on how these decisions are made. This is clearly a Twitter type of issue in which they honor request for "certain types of folks". If you're a member of the propaganda elite, the answer is "yes". If you're a small-town working man, the answer is "no". If you're an Antifa thug, the answer is "yes". If you're a boy scout, the answer is "no".

> It isn't arbitrary, it was requested and honored. This is how they operate their service.

You should have read the whole article because they said they reached out to The Wayback Machine on their policy on honoring requests and denying request, and they refused to produce a policy. Sometimes the request is denied and sometimes approved. You've got to read the whole article.

Wait a second, friend...there is something you should know about the Way Back Machine. It isn't an unbiased repository of information. They arbitrarily scrub the archives of inconvenient truths from time to time. They recently scrubbed the internet of the past tweets of a notorious doxxer who harasses women and private citizens for tweeting politics she doesn't like under the guise of "journalism".

> It’s not dead, but it has been resting.

Naw, it's dead. When I visited the U.K. in the 1990's, I was struck at how different and politicized their mainstream news was compared to the United States. I was grateful for the objectivity we had in most American news outlets by comparison. Then, all of that started to change around 9/11 and the Bush years...and any objectivity completely went away during the Trump years. Now, our news media is far worse than what I remember about the U.K. 30 years ago. Journalism in England never got better, and I don't expect it to get better in the U.S. now either.