FITnLIT7

FITnLIT7 t1_iyo7lm3 wrote

Glad that worked out for you, being a parent is a wonderful thing. (My first is 7 months old). Genetics will always play a major part but that I can’t control (not some gene editing nut job) but if you have genetics as a December baby to outgrow and outperform everyone else your age, just imagine that same kid as a January baby. It’s really just a preference thing and it’s a small thing I can control to help tip the odds in my child’s favour in this difficult world.

2

FITnLIT7 t1_iyo511b wrote

I mean it can happen. I wouldn’t necessarily aim for a child to be born in January for this reason. My son now was born in April. And If I could “aim” for a date it would be Feb/March. People can deny it all they want but I’ve seen too many late year baby boys get bullied for being smaller - even if it’s just In the early years of school that shit leaves a lasting negative affect.

7

FITnLIT7 t1_iymc091 wrote

Thank god something I can show my fiancée. She really doesn’t understand it. I by no means need to have my next child in January but I just won’t plan to have a late year baby.. for girls it’s not much of an issue, but it makes a difference for boys early in life and sports.

−5

FITnLIT7 t1_istgz3c wrote

Another dumb assumption to make.. no one said he found all these balls on one course or during 1 round. He found 51 balls total - the fact he found the most expensive/premium ball the most in a sport that is expensive by nature is no surprise. Odds are not even 2 of those 7 belong to the same person.

−1