DBDude
DBDude t1_jdimo3b wrote
Me in 2010: "Boeing and SpaceX both unveiled their capsules. Good luck SpaceX, Boeing's going to nail crewed flight with all their experience."
Then 2014 hits, SpaceX announces Dragon 2 for crew. Boeing, where are you? Still working on it I hope.
Then 2019 SpaceX successfully tests a Crew Dragon trip to the ISS, while Boeing fails a test flight. WTF is going on?
Then 2020 SpaceX delivers crew to the ISS, and we still have no clue when Starliner will fly.
How the great have fallen.
DBDude t1_jctp25a wrote
Reply to comment by LifeIsNotFairOof in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
What we know of it so far looks about like an M1. It’s unlikely it will match an M2, and it will show up on the market after the M3 (not just a few months). Don’t they know you’re supposed to lead a target? They aimed at two years behind.
Their big problem will be heat. Apple’s M are throttled by heat in small devices, and so will theirs. If you see a big score, find out what kind of device it was on. Don’t compare a desktop Q chip with an Apple laptop or tablet.
DBDude t1_jcscpsj wrote
Reply to comment by LifeIsNotFairOof in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
Qualcomm is aiming for M1 performance levels with Oryon. It will be somewhere around the Pro or Max, but slower than Ultra.
It’s running quite late, so it’ll be shipping in devices after Apple already has the M3 on the market.
DBDude t1_jcr0c01 wrote
Reply to comment by squeevey in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
They tried this with the Fiero using snap-on plastic body panels. The panels ended up being expensive and few people took advantage of it.
DBDude t1_jcr06pv wrote
Apple demanding to do everything itself when it doesn’t have a car is going to keep it out of the market. Qualcomm doesn’t have anything close to an M1 chip, which Apple could already be selling to car makers.
DBDude t1_jcearei wrote
Well, at least misinformation they don’t like. The rest will be left alone, or even propagated by the government itself.
DBDude t1_jcbgguf wrote
Reply to comment by Disastrous_Elk_6375 in NASA picks Axiom Space for its third astronaut mission to the ISS by nick313
It's not Russian, it won't accidentally spin the ISS.
It is a pretty brilliant idea to bootstrap a new space station off ISS instead of starting from scratch.
DBDude t1_jcb1uk4 wrote
Reply to comment by Analyst7 in NASA picks Axiom Space for its third astronaut mission to the ISS by nick313
They go up on Crew Dragon. Eventually they plan to have their own ISS modules, which will then spin off to become their own space station.
DBDude t1_jc25n76 wrote
Reply to DODEA students free themselves from overturned school bus near Ramstein Air Base; minor injuries reported by CW1DR5H5I64A
>Kaiserslautern High School junior Vera Bahl said she then used her school-issued Chromebook to shatter the door so kids could climb out.
Don't they have those little glass breaking hammers in the buses anymore?
DBDude t1_jbpkt4n wrote
Reply to comment by the_hell_you_say in TIL that actor Red Foxx was only 49 when he starred in Sandford & Son. He wore makeup to look older. by SaltyDogBill
Very close, but I've always liked the funky Night Court one better.
DBDude t1_jbpkiji wrote
Reply to comment by ElJamoquio in TIL that actor Red Foxx was only 49 when he starred in Sandford & Son. He wore makeup to look older. by SaltyDogBill
His Air Force photo may disturb you.
DBDude t1_jbpk8fg wrote
Reply to comment by GrandmaPoses in TIL that actor Red Foxx was only 49 when he starred in Sandford & Son. He wore makeup to look older. by SaltyDogBill
AFV was okay, Full House, eh, but Saget doing comedy otherwise was frickin' hilarious.
Also, watch Brad Williams to see a practical joke Saget played on John Stamos using Brad.
DBDude t1_jbpjnid wrote
Reply to comment by ironroad18 in TIL that actor Red Foxx was only 49 when he starred in Sandford & Son. He wore makeup to look older. by SaltyDogBill
If you watch the more current series Mrs. Brown's Boys (Brendan O'Carroll in old woman drag), he is constantly roasting the shit out of his neighbor, who in real life is his sister. His wife also plays one of his kids, and his son and daughter also have roles.
DBDude t1_jbpj2j7 wrote
Reply to comment by BenovanStanchiano in TIL that actor Red Foxx was only 49 when he starred in Sandford & Son. He wore makeup to look older. by SaltyDogBill
If there's anything Redd would have wanted, it would be to get in one last joke as he died.
DBDude t1_jaz3ep4 wrote
Reply to comment by Sunflower_After_Dark in Half of all active satellites are now from SpaceX. Here’s why that may be a problem by ye_olde_astronaut
SpaceX has to play by the rules.
DBDude t1_jaykedb wrote
Reply to comment by Sunflower_After_Dark in Half of all active satellites are now from SpaceX. Here’s why that may be a problem by ye_olde_astronaut
SpaceX wanted to get paid like everyone else. About the drones, they were exported with license for general communications. SpaceX did not have ITAR permission to export weapons systems. Dual-use technology can be legally dangerous. So Shotwell said to stop doing that.
DBDude t1_jay9b4g wrote
Reply to comment by Sunflower_After_Dark in Half of all active satellites are now from SpaceX. Here’s why that may be a problem by ye_olde_astronaut
Every other company was getting paid in full to provide its products and services to Ukraine. You think Raytheon was giving away Javelins for free? What’s wrong with SpaceX wanting some payment for continuing operations too?
DBDude t1_jay91ky wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Half of all active satellites are now from SpaceX. Here’s why that may be a problem by ye_olde_astronaut
SpaceX has already saved the government far more more money than it spent.
DBDude t1_jaolqyi wrote
Reply to comment by Kemro59 in After flying four astronauts into orbit, SpaceX makes its 101st straight landing — ‘I just feel so lucky that I get to fly on this amazing machine.’ by marketrent
One reason Arianne isn’t doing it is because the rocket maker needs to keep making new rockets, and you don’t need new ones if you land them.
DBDude t1_jaj2v8d wrote
Reply to comment by Shotgun5250 in NASA’s DART data validates kinetic impact as planetary defense method | DART altered the orbit of the asteroid moonlet Dimorphos by 33 minutes by mepper
Quite a bit more, I’d say a few degrees.
DBDude t1_jaitei1 wrote
Reply to NASA’s DART data validates kinetic impact as planetary defense method | DART altered the orbit of the asteroid moonlet Dimorphos by 33 minutes by mepper
Fun fact: If you Google NASA DART, the spacecraft will fly into the page, which gets hit and stays crooked.
DBDude t1_jadt06k wrote
It was a genius idea to dispense with individual injector mechanisms and just rely on natural motion from spinning them. You can pack in a lot more satellites that way.
DBDude t1_jadsn35 wrote
Reply to Interesting take on SpaceX’s 2023 Revenue by KotesFolly_
Looks like Starlink revenue may slightly surpass launch revenue, but that Starlink program also has a massive cost, as it'll take up about twice as many launches as SpaceX is getting paid for, plus the cost of the satellites.
DBDude t1_jads473 wrote
A rocket motor needs liquid propellant at best, so no. So like a jet engine first stage? A Falcon 9 is already 40 miles up in less than two minutes. Your jet first stage would maybe be able to get the rocket to 40,000 feet before rockets have to take over, so maybe some tens of seconds of flight. And then we have size/weight issues. Our most powerful jet engine is the GE9X at 110,000 lbs thrust. You'd need several of these to replace rockets, and they're huge and heavy.
The best idea we have so far is to haul a rocket up high on a jet airplane and then launch it, but that only works for smaller rockets.
DBDude t1_jdkl6kn wrote
Reply to comment by pm_me_ur_ephemerides in Rocket Lab targets $50 million launch price for Neutron rocket to challenge SpaceX’s Falcon 9 by cnbc_official
Estimated $15 million for the upper stage, the most expensive part of the launch.