Charlesinrichmond

Charlesinrichmond t1_je9zpb9 wrote

it can travel decently, it's droplets of water so as far as that goes. But usually the applicators for something like this won't be going more than 5 feet if that. I didn't see what they were using of course, but it would be pretty obvious as there would be large swaths of dead park.

So highly highly unlikely to be an issue.

2

Charlesinrichmond t1_je9yr0x wrote

depends on lease language. Basically a lease gives you certain rights to the property. You might actually be leasing the patio, or you might have access.

And you may only be leasing certain rights to the patio. Basically, look at the lease language.

But honestly, the easiest thing will be talking to the property manager here, and see if there is even an issue, and if 10 minutes of moving flower pots will solve it

3

Charlesinrichmond t1_je0w4eg wrote

Reply to comment by _sarten in RVA vs. Evernest by harpervn

that used to be the case. I don't think it is anymore, but it's a good question, I'll read up on it. They basically made it applicable to everyone the last few years...

Yeah, looks like 90 days is the cutoff now

ยง 55.1-1201. Applicability of chapter; local authority

1

Charlesinrichmond t1_je0b0ln wrote

Reply to comment by mordenumero1 in RVA vs. Evernest by harpervn

you don't here about the good ones. Saying they are all like that gives cover to Dobrin, Pollard & bagby/Walid Daniels, and Evernest.

If you follow this sub, I think there is no doubt those are the top 3.

2