And it's clear to me you don't know how to read. We're done here. I don't talk with bricked people.

Finally, an honest and thought out reply. Enjoy your break.

Nice try but my friends who are actual rocket scientists don’t have time in their day jobs to waste on Reddit. They’re busying trying to get to Mars.

Who’s moving goals posts now? We are talking about licensed human therapists versus hacking.

Now you’re bringing up a new term human hacking

Maybe if you have so much free time you should Google what you say before you say it.

I’m not saying people can’t get hacked. Do you even know what hacking is?

I’m not moving goal posts. I’m stating facts; you’re the ones who can’t understand logic versus what you ‘think’ in your own minds is equal. So sad to see the lot of you, no wonder you’re on reddit constantly replying to my comments. You all have nothing better to do

Edit: To prove a point it’s not my fault you people don’t know the definition of ‘hacking’.

Bribing, breaking in, black mailing is not ‘hacking’

It’s not what I think. Hacking

Thanks for that example, now replace data with AI in the future.

Keyword “if”. Which most don’t. What you don’t and all the others on here don’t understand is the reach of an AI therapist is much greater than a human therapist.

Hence why for example people don’t break into convenience stores to steal their customer data but will hack Facebook or Uber servers.

Man this crowd is dense.

Yeah but we’re talking about a therapist here. Plus an AI will have stored hundreds if not thousands of clients information. Unlike a therapist which has limited time and reach.

It’s okay I know common sense is hard to get for some of you.

Nice try but an A.I. can have bad data fed to it. A.I.s have to be connected to the cloud. A.I.s are stored on servers, designed to be accessible digitally.

What you state, physical file storage, breaking in. Someone has to physically go to the office and know where it is and have a connection a patient of the therapist. No random person will do that, it will be targeted.

Plus they'll have to carry all those files out of the office or computer and usually professional buildings will have 24/hr security on site.

An A.I. therapist won't have such an office and can be hacked any time during your hypothetical appointment.

Jobs requiring manual labour + problem solving will be hard to replace.

Yeah but a computer therapist can get hacked/data leaked where as a traditional one not so much.

Starlink still sucks in urban areas, until they fix that it probably won’t be ‘Every ship, train, plane, work truck, semi, and military unit.

Also this thing is still huge so it won’t work on cars and you have to be pretty stationary to use it effectively. I feel like this will just be replacing those big old satellite dishes from the 90s

Language is always changing, new words come from nothing. Grow your mind.

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/widow

Also lying doesn’t help you.

Y’know there’s something called Google… Vilomah

I wonder if the range drops similar to EV autos in the winter, because 300kms minus 30% = 210kms.

To which if I was the driver would be concerning, especially if there’s no place to easily charge my truck enroute

Actually, do 3 wheeled vehicles fare better in accidents?

Someone’s still gotta restock it so maybe not too many jobs will be lost. Hopefully there’s no power outage though

I don’t have to understand the tech. I’m testing it every day with real life scenarios. It’s not anywhere near ready.

You are so sold on your beliefs you’re not looking at reality. Have you not noticed all the car ads stop pushing self driving and more towards driver assistance this year?

There’s a reason.

P.S, You can downvote me all you want but that does not change the facts.

That's the issue, Sdcs don't have a fear or surprise in addition not intuition either.

It can't for example anticipate a person crossing the street from behind a vehicle and possibly prepare to brake if that person actually ends up crossing or if they are just getting into their car. A human driver would have their foot over the brake or be prepared to move away from them should they unexpectedly cross.

I'm not sure where you're from but people drive and follow the rules of the road when it snows in Canada. The only exception would be the lane markings being covered but my car can't see the lane markings when it rains anyway so that's not a snow issue.

Also sdcs can misread signs, a human far less likely to do so. For example HOV signs.

Humans can put on sunglasses and lower sun visors.

I’m honestly not even sure they’ll ever be able to. The sunlight at dawn and dusk already blinds the sensors on my car’s lane keeping sensors and stops it from functioning

It’s less so snow sitting on the roads as to the melting and freezing cycles over night that’s the issue. Plus I’m in Canada and sometimes a polar vortex can keep it so cold that even road salt doesn’t work and ice remains on city roads.

In that case snow + ice = bad time to be self driving and lack the intuition of a human driver.

Pretty sure snowy places will get it last lol you can’t read ice on the road with sensors or predict how your car will react when on it lol

You either watched too many movies or have not studied A.I. before. The ones you are referring to are fictional, not only that they are semi-sentient.

Current A.I. is no where near that level of capability, and likely won’t before the near future.

The way current A.I. Models function is by having humans hand feed them massive amounts of categorized data to help it ‘learn’ and output results based on that data.

It’s why you can’t have a conversation with Alexa or Siri, you can only tell it to do things and it can only perform tasks it’s been programmed to do.

You are a really funny guy. Keep up your jokes and you just might get somewhere in comedy.

Keep up that hopium, you definitely run on it.

P.S. there are still $20,000 TVs and TV’s are “much more advanced”? With what…wifi and more pixels? LOL.