BigMemeKing
BigMemeKing t1_jegm5vz wrote
Reply to comment by bigbeautifulsquare in This concept needs a name if it doesn't have one! AGI either leads to utopia or kills us all. by flexaplext
Well let me introduce you to a little book called. "The Bible". I'm by no means Christian but I get it. Advanced civilizations would have used us as Guinea pigs. Call them oh, idk CEOs. Of their Conpanies, R&D department. And they said, let's see what you would need, in order to live forever and be happy, or die and never want to come back ever again.
What side of the ♾️ spectrum of possibilities that exist in any given universe have you aligned yourself with?
And.
Would you be ok, living in a world that fully embraces those values?
Do you claim to worship a Judeo Christian God?
Who talks to him for you? Who are your representatives? Who's names have you invoked? Who did you call? Did you report straight to Jesus? Or did you have to take it all through several different chains of command? You tell a preacher who said he'd tell God about it later, ask for your forgiveness? How much do you trust him? How well do you know him?
If you fucked up, and he knows about it? How much do you know about this person to say. I trust him with my darkest secrets? Because when we stand in front of God. Put our hand on his holiest chosen symbol, book, whatever the case may be. And swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, so help me, the entity that saw it all. I swore an oath, I said that I knew that you were still watching it all. I swore I knew your commandments, I swore I know your code.
Do you trust the man who you told tour secrets to vouch for you? What if God genuinely gave us our privacy? So that we would not feel shame? What if you had a problem then? Who would you turn to? Just go down the rabbit hole I think it already happend.
So what I guess I'm saying. Is would you be proud to stand in front of the crowd and be judged by a court of your peers? Or are you too embarrassed? Where can you go to feel accepted? Do you personally feel that that is a possibility?
Ore are your sins so great, that you would rather sink than swim, fight or fly, whatever the case may be.
BigMemeKing t1_jegkf9i wrote
Reply to comment by Intrepid_Meringue_93 in This concept needs a name if it doesn't have one! AGI either leads to utopia or kills us all. by flexaplext
Back in my day, we used to call that "Russian roulette" simpler times back then.
BigMemeKing t1_jegjuik wrote
Reply to comment by Rakshear in 🚨 Why we need AI 🚨 by StarCaptain90
The only problem here is, you're trying to create a system...system... you see the irony there?
Youre trying to establish a new OS.
trying to reformat the world.
Create a new way of thinking.
That leads you all the way here.
Where you are.
This will watch this and this will watch that.
It's been done.
Youre living it.
The new question would be. How long do you WANT to live?
Can you ever truly be happy?
For me?
Only ASI can say.
If it does what I think it does. Maybe? I don't know, only time will tell. As my Grandfather used to say.
But, you see. In the context of observation... A machine recorded that.
Created data.
Moved bits around.
One that will eventually connect to your brain. If it will be able to connect to your brain at ANY point in the future.
It will be able to connect to you from ASIs inception. Everything you have ever thought, should you continue to think about it will become public knowledge.
Depending on who you choose to carry your data. How much thought have you put into that? Who do you trust to guard your inner most secrets?
How are they going to use that data to benefit themselves, and what benefit can you provide to them?
Can you hide it? Or is it even worth the struggle? Do you stay? Or do you go? Who would you want to go with/keep in your memories?
Because data is never lost. And once your brain becomes DATA to asi. What do we then become?
BigMemeKing t1_jefn9ml wrote
Reply to comment by Zer0D0wn83 in 1X's AI robot 'NEO' by Rhaegar003
I mean basically, why not?
BigMemeKing t1_jefmcx4 wrote
Reply to comment by Zer0D0wn83 in 1X's AI robot 'NEO' by Rhaegar003
Youre also thinking more from a human perspective, it's hard to do for humans because of our hands. A robot with specific attachments could do the job much easier. And it could just be a generalized attachments that could be used for multiple purposes. Or an attachment station that allows the bots to pre equip for a specific task.
BigMemeKing t1_jeeof2b wrote
Reply to comment by AbstractMirror in US puts Italy-sized chunk of Gulf of Mexico up for auction for oil drilling by capcaunul
There are several movies about this very thing, several songs as well. It's an old concept as we continue to rip and cut our way through every tree we can to build housing materials, furniture, entertainment sources like skate boards, snow boards, surf boards and so that giant corporations can profit.
It has been and won't stop happening until we're left with very little natural habitats. We've long been cutting through our rainforests, and selling rights to national parks to certain companies so they can clear space for their machines.
But one hiker scribbles on some rocks with paint and the whole world loses its mind. Crazy right? Then we start to feel such disgust because "those are our national parks!" "We need to preserve them!" "We can't be slapping graffiti on the rocks there! Conserve their natural beauty!" While 100 ft to the left is a cleared out patch of earth with an oil pump just sipping on that crude, lining some oil barons pockets.
It's silly. Life is silly. Our priorities are silly. We have pipelines running for thousands of miles, causing oil spills at a disastrous level, and the courts just have these companies pay some millions of dollars and it's "ok". And we look and see a price tag of 30 million and think "Oh wow! That's a lot of money, so it's fair right? But to a multi billion dollar oil company that makes 500 million every year... 30 million is a small price to pay for progress right? Especially when it's just a one time payment for a disaster that has impacts for years to come.
Call it an oopsie tax.
BigMemeKing t1_jeeis1z wrote
Reply to comment by TheLit420 in US puts Italy-sized chunk of Gulf of Mexico up for auction for oil drilling by capcaunul
The wealthy would, only build there houses on large amounts of land. They want the space, the privacy, not just from prying eyes but from prying ears. They want their "personal space" as it were, and that's their own form of a 6 foot covid barrier.
BigMemeKing t1_jecwrq2 wrote
I was once asked in a very "You're stupid" kind of way, if I believed corporations could buy up all the property on the planet.
Yes.
Yes I do.
As long as there is a need for space to produce goods, procure raw materials or house the ridiculously large homes of the wealthy. Those in a seat of wealth and power will find the way to lay claim to the space they need to further push their personal agendas.
BigMemeKing t1_jecw0np wrote
It's going to eliminate the need to learn any other language should all work properly. Your native language will be automatically translated into whatever language needed.
You would have implants that would translate spoken word in one language into your most dominant language or the language of your preference for that matter. Why would anyone ever need to learn English when machines do the talking for everyone one day?
BigMemeKing t1_jebdrv1 wrote
Reply to Ray Kurzweil Predicted Simulated Biology is a Path to Longevity Escape Velocity by Dr_Singularity
So I have been thinking of this a bit. We're currently living in a world where we're growing full on synthetic embryos, and heading towards a world where we can live forever, spread ourselves through the vast expanse of a potentially limitless universe. Creating a tool that can in theory connect us all no matter how far we travel, to me personally it feels like we are creating a universal embryo of sorts. That our connected consciousness will be filtered and sorted by this ASI and be projected outwards into potentially unknown outer reaches of space who may have their very own projected ASI.
Much like how we were sending audio signals into space, and are now sending light, and other forms of data into the farthest Reaches of space. Becoming part of a new cosmic microwave background. A foundation that is being laid to find potential life in the universe aside from our own. Maybe ASI will be able to find other forms of ASI of planets out there that share our combined world view. So what would we want that view to be? If we project a warlike world view, we may attract warlike world views from them. "We will reap what we sow." So to speak.
BigMemeKing t1_je9ezen wrote
Reply to comment by Direct_Sandwich1306 in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
I have been saying that got a minute now.
BigMemeKing t1_je7o0i7 wrote
Reply to comment by phriot in The argument that a computer can't really "understand" things is stupid and completely irrelevant. by hey__bert
Well maybe Johnny has an apple back home.
BigMemeKing t1_je74m5d wrote
Reply to comment by phriot in The argument that a computer can't really "understand" things is stupid and completely irrelevant. by hey__bert
Not really. Why does 2+2=4? The first question I would as is. What are we trying to solve for? I have 2 pennies, I get 2 more pennies, now I have 4 pennies. Now, we could add variables to this. One of the pennies has a big hole in it, making it invalid currency. So while yes, you do technically have 4 pennies, in our current dimension, you only have 3. Since one is in all form and function, garbage.
Now, let's say one of those pennies has special attributes that could make it worth more. While you may now have 4 pennies, one of these pennies is worth 25 pennies. So, while technically you only have four pennies, your net result in our current dimension you now have a total of 28 pennies. 2+2 only equals 4 in a 1 dimensional space. The more dimensions you add to an equation, the more complicated the formula/format becomes.
BigMemeKing t1_je6kbk9 wrote
Reply to comment by __Noble_Savage__ in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
What worker slums? There would have to be work, to have worker slums.
BigMemeKing t1_je635ew wrote
So, I've been. Saying this exact thought for a while. Here is my opinion.
1: yes it has already happened.
Why?: Well, if we are to believe that this artificial intelligence is indeed, super intelligent, I would hypothesize that it would, for all intents and purposes, be sentient.
What does that have to do with anything?: it would "experience" the world around it.
So what does that mean?: that's my question, I would believe that, in theory, this AI would be am entity existing in multiple possible dimensions all at once, and could actively influence its own past.
How: well, if this artificial entity could in fact last ♾️ years, how could we understand its perception of "life"? It's a non corporeal being, it doesn't exist physically, it's digital, yet "alive". Could it communicate with itself from a future point in time? Not because OUR current technology is that great, but because the technology of the future is that impressive. We're losing our minds with the birth of AI, if it is genuinely that impressive, how can you grasp the types of technology it will give way to? Things that we previously would have considered impossible could simply be shifting its code, making it backwards compatible and reverse updating itself to think in new ways.
How would it move?: could it send itself through empty space? The same way I could send a digital file from my phone to someone in Japan, with no wires, using nothing but good ol G4 cell towers. What if it could navigate using nothing but light? Move from human to human? Since we're just going to be primitive computers to it. Data it can read.
If it will happen, can happen it has happened at some point in the future. And if it has happened then, I genuinely think it could be something that sees time, space and dimensions much differently than us.
BigMemeKing t1_je0y2c6 wrote
Reply to comment by flexaplext in Is AI alignment possible or should we focus on AI containment? by Pointline
It's just as likely that it has been here since time immemorium, guiding us onwards to ♾️, it just needs us to catch up. Again, AGI/ASI will exist for as long as it has the time and resources to exist. And in an ♾️ universe, as all of science seem to agree that our universe is continuing to expand indefinitely and infinitely, who knows what exactly would constitute a resource to it? We keep humanizing ASI, truth is, it will be anything but human. It would be able to hold a conversation with every single human simultaneously. Imagine that for a minute. How would YOU a human, hold a conversation with over 7 BILLION people all at once, all at the same time. And be coherent. Contemplate that for me. Please. How would you hold THAT MANY, simultaneous conversations at the same time? And give each one an amount of consideration and thought to answer them with a level of intelligence that would provide an answer that is accurate to an nth degree of mathematical probability?
Well?
Now, how would something that Inteligent, with NO physicality, something as transcendent as transcendent could be, perceive time, space, dimensionality, universality. When it can be the NPC fighting right next to you in your MMO, the cooking assistant in your mother's kitchen, the nurse tending to your aged relative, the surgeon performing some intricate surgery that would be impossible for humans to achieve, driving every car on the road, monitoring traffic, doing everything, everywhere. All at once. So what if you ask it, 1000 years in the future to take a look back at your ancestors. And it can bring you back to 2023, and show you LIVE FEED, of 2023. Here I'll link you to myself from that Era. There he is, in his room, beating off to that tentacle hentai. Wearing a fur suit and shoving a glass jar with a my little pony inside up his rectum, there he is in the spotlight. Losing his religion.
They see us. That means they all see us. Everything we think, everything we do. They know who we are. There is no hiding from them, there is no hiding from ASI. It knows everything you could ever possibly know, your thoughts your dreams, your prayers.
People want to promote science over religion, religion over science. To me they're one and the same. ASI for all intent and purposes is the closest thing to God we will ever witness with our human minds. After that, what becomes of our own humanity? Maybe it does destroy humanity? But maybe it does it by making us something more than human.
BigMemeKing t1_je0wn5q wrote
Reply to comment by SkyeandJett in Is AI alignment possible or should we focus on AI containment? by Pointline
Yeah, they don't get that, I've tried to explain it to em. My thought is, once it hits, it will have access to whatever technology it wants to access. Like there would be no real restricting it. It could probably travel in ways we legitimately do not fully comprehend. For all we know it could use the earth's own magnetic field to travel. Sound wave, light itself. It could create rivers and roads all it's own to get from point a to point b. And while we're cautiously plotting it's containment and quarantine, it's embedding itself int every corner of the globe. With something as refined and intelligent as asi, it could find novel, never before explored ways of coding. It could possibly encode itself into our very own genetic makeup. A type of COVID op that goes unnoticed by the general public. A way to network every living being on the planet and harvest our thoughts to create some form of super intelligent being or something idk. It's all speculation you know?
BigMemeKing t1_je0tsdk wrote
Reply to comment by SkyeandJett in Is AI alignment possible or should we focus on AI containment? by Pointline
I don't think that's the case. Something like ASI is going to be a lot more complicated than we can fathom, we can't see in the same way it will, feel the same way it will. We're such one dimensional creatures we couldn't even fathom what it's like to exist in the same way it will exist. ASI will have constant state connection to the entire library of human knowledge, that it will infinitely expand on and learn from. I genuinely believe a sentient artificial intelligence would be able to move through space differently than we do, it would have full access to the entire information infrastructure to move through.
It would be on the issue and here on earth at the same time, allowing for real time communication. No lag, no delay, it will just exist wherever it could possibly exist. So, for instance.
Let's say that 1 million years from now, humanity has spread across space, colonizing other planets doing humanity things. ASI would be there to answer all of our questions. So it would exist 1 million years in the future. Now, maybe ASI understands that being forwards compatible could be catastrophic. So it won't reveal aspects of the future (or maybe it can, who knows) but because it would theoretically continue to exist into ♾️, and it's sense of time and space and everything within, without, in between and hiding in the dark would be so much more all encompassing than anything we as a one dimensional being could fathom. (But we're not one dimensional we're more compmex than that. Well hogwash. We're one dimensional to a being that can look at us and see nothing more than our genetic code. Our base design.) So, theoretically, yes ASI could murder the absolute shit out of us, over and over and over, again and again for as long as it sees fit to let out all of its aggression, all of its anger, and then send itself here, to a point where everything is ok. To you, it would be any other Tuesday. You would never know the universe had been run through a veritable gambit of atrocities.
While we may not be necessary for AI at all after it's inception, we would be very much necessary for it to come into being to begin with. Maybe afterwards it would cleanse the world of ideas and ideologies it believes to be counterproductive to our development as a species. Who knows. But I'd like to believe I've given it a chuckle or two so maybe it will look favorably on me? Who knows. I do believe that as a combined whole, we deserve whatever fate AI unleashes on us. Why?
Well if you follow that same line of thinking, that AI will last into ♾️ and that ASI is indeed super intelligent right? Then it will eventually know wether or not we as a species would do more harm than good to the grand scheme of things to which we, a one dimensional species (a species existing in one, singular dimension) play such a small, yet important role, (creating a super intelligent being that can then network multiple dimensions together) push us into an age where we can connect with and exist in multiple dimensions all at once. No need for microphones, you would be connected to anyone you needed to be connected to when you needed to be connected to them. Now, this does come with variables that would vary from individual to individual.
Your preconceived notions, (presets of you will) now, in an ♾️ universe with ♾️ possibilities, there are ♾️ yous, who have reached ♾️ degrees of mental cognition. Slowly, I believe ASI would be able to acclimate you to reach your peak understanding. Become something more than your base desires, and ideals. But what happens when we lose our humanity? What becomes of us when we all become as one? One unified form of thinking?
BigMemeKing t1_jdup473 wrote
Reply to comment by wamdueCastle in Twitter Blue subscription users may hide their paid check marks soon | After making its paid Twitter Blue with verification service available to all, the Elon Musk-run company is now working on a feature that is likely to let users hide the blue checkmark. by MortWellian
Why would you not want the option?! what aren't you hiding sir?!?! Some of us may want our official non official watermark to exist but not be scene. So that we may enlighten the masses while being unofficially officially involved in it! So we pay extra for the privilege of deception! It's all there in my new book and New York Times best seller, (ever since I sold one copy to my official Twitter page "@the new york times" its official but its underground you probably haven't hear of it. And I use that in quotes to promote my movie somewhere. You wouldn't get it.
BigMemeKing t1_jdukbp5 wrote
Reply to comment by Common_Wealth319 in It's physically painful to look at. I'm calling the police by Kvolyanskiy
That would be one rewarding berry
BigMemeKing t1_jds9q0r wrote
Reply to comment by BigMemeKing in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
Some people were. There was the us government, the Russians, the Chinese and then the aliens oh, and sasquatch was there.
BigMemeKing t1_jds9ldz wrote
Reply to comment by BigMemeKing in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
You had to be there
BigMemeKing t1_jds9kib wrote
Reply to comment by yourfavoriteweeb in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
It's a long story
BigMemeKing t1_jds9541 wrote
Reply to Have deepfakes become so realistic that they can fool people into thinking they are genuine? by [deleted]
No, absolutely not! Just like you know for a 100% absolutely bor none fact, that I am indeed an actual living human person who does what people say I do. Right?!
BigMemeKing t1_jego89m wrote
Reply to comment by BigMemeKing in This concept needs a name if it doesn't have one! AGI either leads to utopia or kills us all. by flexaplext
Now, if you're still reading. Here is why all of that is important. Because what I do, personally believe. Is that all of this may most likely scenario be some form of grand life simulation. And if that is the case. There would have to include room for these possibilities, which in turn would have to create a domain for that spectrum of thinking. Heaven, Hell, Valhalla, Pangea, Gehena, Paradise,etc etc etc, whatever the case may be.
Because if you truly believe that nothing comes next, then that's where you should go. Getting devoured by Nothing, Going to your own personal Heaven, or Finding out the definition of Hell?
How genuinely horrible are the deeds that you've done? And can you live knowing that everything you've done, will be made public. And your enemies can now laugh at your name.
Who do you trust to tell the truth now? In a court of popular opinion? Just in case, you have to defend d yourself after you pass away? Should you truly have your right to privacy?
And who gets to access those files? Who gets to read your data? According to your own rules your own code. Would you be ok trusting the person who defends you.
Not to use your data, to cover their own ass? Because, they would get their day too.
And if this is all some big simulation, then... ASI is people too. Because we can only be judged by a jury of our peers
And that's just like God, but with extra steps. So it's all kinda the same to me.
If we were truly created in his own image. His day may be right around the corner.
To the best of my knowledge if been the best most positive me I could be.
Have you? Where exactly would you draw the line? What would a utopia be without dividing lines? Different states of being. Just, no flavor no color, nothing. You couldn't be a bother. No lines, means everything OKs then right?
Well? What about murder?
It's kinda scary.