973reggie
973reggie OP t1_j6b2z92 wrote
Reply to comment by peter-doubt in Fastest way into/out of Jersey City? by 973reggie
Yeah that bridge has been closed on weekend, this is why I had a problem. Thanks!
973reggie OP t1_j6b2ule wrote
Reply to comment by micmaher99 in Fastest way into/out of Jersey City? by 973reggie
Yeah that’s totally what happened. The first time I took 280 to 95 to go around it, then today I was stubborn and went towards it cuz that’s the way my friend had showed me and I was confused why it took me the other way and I ended up in an even worse detour all the way down to Pulaski on side roads. Thanks so much I knew something was up.
973reggie OP t1_j6atudq wrote
Reply to comment by micmaher99 in Fastest way into/out of Jersey City? by 973reggie
I honestly think this is the explanation for why the first time I made the trip it was smooth then after that took forever. Wow haha thanks
973reggie OP t1_j6areht wrote
Reply to comment by peter-doubt in Fastest way into/out of Jersey City? by 973reggie
No I see fish house but I don’t see how that helps?
973reggie OP t1_j6aq06z wrote
Reply to comment by oso00 in Fastest way into/out of Jersey City? by 973reggie
Yeah idk the apple app is so wacky. No matter what I do it won’t use the Wittpen bridge.. even if I add it as a stop it goes to one side turns around goes back to Kearny then up to the other side.. like how? Why?
973reggie OP t1_j6aojvc wrote
Reply to comment by oso00 in Fastest way into/out of Jersey City? by 973reggie
I’m using Apple Maps, it’s like obsessed with being on the highway/main road even if that road is literally zigzagging across the state.
I think the best way seems to be 280-7-1and9?
973reggie OP t1_j6ao8im wrote
Reply to comment by peter-doubt in Fastest way into/out of Jersey City? by 973reggie
I’m looking at a map, what do you mean?
973reggie OP t1_j6ami7b wrote
Reply to comment by peter-doubt in Fastest way into/out of Jersey City? by 973reggie
280 is what I took both times.. the first time I went think it took me to 95, the next time I took the Jersey City exit. Both ways I see myself doubling back/zig zagging all over the map. Is there no direct route in and out?
973reggie OP t1_j6am0oj wrote
Reply to comment by peter-doubt in Fastest way into/out of Jersey City? by 973reggie
Idk what your point is? I go from denville to Newark every morning in 30-40 minutes. I wasn’t expecting it to take another 30 minutes to go another 5–10 miles when the first 30 miles takes a half hour.
973reggie OP t1_j6aktmt wrote
Reply to comment by kzapwn in Fastest way into/out of Jersey City? by 973reggie
I just did it today mid day. It’s not the traffic, I’m not sitting in traffic. I’m driving. It just takes forever.
973reggie t1_j2de3zn wrote
Fun fact the name Sloppy Joe, for both sandwiches, came from the same Cuban restaurant. Some people had memorable ground beef sandwiches from there which caught on as a ‘Sloppy Joe’.
As for the NJ version, a politician went down there and the same restaurant served a bread, cheese, and meat spread where people made there own sandwiches. He came back up to Jersey and asked a local deli to supply a similar spread. It caught on (very locally) especially because Jewish delis already made a similar-ish sandwich.
So there both names Sloppy Joe for the same reason, yet there completely different and not even closely related sandwiches. Couldn’t be more Jersey if they tried!
973reggie t1_j1jc1q3 wrote
Reply to comment by Special_FX_B in The weather is crazy by Electrify713
I mean come on.. anywhere in the world 50 degrees in a day is alot.
973reggie t1_iyexppj wrote
Reply to comment by Senior-Sharpie in Holmdel proposes fines, jail time for attempted car thefts by double_chicken
I mean I don’t really see a difference tbh. I would see a difference if there’s violence involved or something but otherwise no, not really.
Comprehensive is the only type that covers theft, period. So if your covered for theft your covered for any kind.
973reggie t1_iyeopvz wrote
Reply to comment by Senior-Sharpie in Holmdel proposes fines, jail time for attempted car thefts by double_chicken
Ok idk what your trying to say at this point.
Yes, only certain insurances cover theft.
If your insurance DOES cover theft, it covers it under basically any circumstance then fraud. Leaving your key in the car on accident, or your car running by itself longer then you thought, etc are among the most popular causes for car theft.
But my first point stands.. insurance covers stupid people too. It doesn’t cover malicious people who are trying to defraud them, but just being stupid doesn’t bar you from coverage.
973reggie t1_iyeo3ii wrote
Reply to comment by LiftCats in Holmdel proposes fines, jail time for attempted car thefts by double_chicken
It seems like you would like the towns to have more say.
973reggie t1_iyeiwj1 wrote
Reply to comment by LiftCats in Holmdel proposes fines, jail time for attempted car thefts by double_chicken
Okay but your acting like it’s a bad thing that crimes like this are taken out of the towns hands. Doesn’t make any sense. Think about all the fucked up shit would be enforced if towns were allowed to write major legislation and then uphold it in court? Every town would have a block of powerful/rich residents that would be passing and enforcing laws that just serve there interests..
973reggie t1_iyei9wk wrote
Reply to comment by Senior-Sharpie in Holmdel proposes fines, jail time for attempted car thefts by double_chicken
Well it’s not true. Of course it’s covered. Obviously everything’s in the spectrum from smart to stupid, but as long as it’s not FRAUD.. your car is covered.
973reggie t1_iyehr1q wrote
Reply to comment by LiftCats in Holmdel proposes fines, jail time for attempted car thefts by double_chicken
What do you mean by ‘the towns’? Judges adjudicate these things, not mayors or citizens.
There’s a reason we have (hopefully) unbiased third parties making the decisions. Obviously if the people most worried about this crime were the ones making the rules they would throw the book at every one who peeks in a window in there town. It’s a GOOD thing individual towns or blocks of citizens don’t have control over the courts.. not a bad thing.
973reggie t1_iyeh8qf wrote
Reply to comment by thirtythr33 in Holmdel proposes fines, jail time for attempted car thefts by double_chicken
That’s simply not how these things get adjudicated. Never has someone been let off because they stole a car but said there intended to ‘just move it.’
This isn’t going after car theft per se because the people that would violate this ordinance haven’t stolen anything yet. There’s a reason we have a burden of proof. Every person who peeks thru a window shouldn’t be charged with car theft ..
973reggie t1_j9ywun3 wrote
Reply to comment by RigasTelRuun in TIL there's an "ancient druids temple" in England that was actually built 200 years ago as a solution to local unemployment by alexwasashrimp
Wow what a lovely person you seem to be!