Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

[deleted] t1_iu2pjqf wrote

[deleted]

66

EdithDich OP t1_iu2vh32 wrote

The residential schools preceded* (and outlasted) the Holocaust by a century.

*and to some degree inspired.

41

Bowsers t1_iu4jozv wrote

Any elaboration on how they inspired?

Edit: just linking a 70 page pdf is not elaborating.

2

EdithDich OP t1_iuawru3 wrote

Hitler was very open about being inspired by the US's Removal, Reservation, and Assimilation Eras of Indian polices for his own regime's approach to Jews and other "undesirables". So much so that Hitler and other Nazi leaders often referred to Jews, Poles, and Ukrainians as “Indians". The Canadian residential schools were based on a US model that tied into the reservation system.

1

Redbanabandana t1_iu4ozy9 wrote

>schools preceded* (and outlasted) the Holocaust by a century. *and to some degree inspired.

What happened with residential schools is a tragedy and an horror but let us not redefine words to suit political/social trends. That you are even comparing residential schools with the holocaust and saying the latter was inspired by the former is ridiculous. Especially considering that the first residential school mass graves were found in the 1970s.

Genocide implies systematic and deliberate killing with the aim of destroying a race or nation. Was that the intent of the residential schools (no)? Were the death the results of murder or was it a result of lack of resources, lack of care and individuals in position of power (e.g., headmasters and priests) acting of their own volition? When and over what time period did the deaths happen?

Residential schools deaths: up to around 4,100 over 120 years mostly from things like lack of care, disease outbreaks (typhoid and tuberculosis) and fires. This represents about 5% of the people that attended the residential schools. The intent of those schools were to assimilate the children into western culture (presumably alive).

Holocaust: 6 million deaths over 4 years by systematic mass murders through nerve gas, combustion chambers and executions. The intent was to kill all Jews. Up to two thirds of the Europeen population of Jews were murdered.

1

Prometheus720 t1_iu6bkio wrote

You're being a jerk.

This is like someone telling an assault victim, "Well I'm sorry that happened to you, but its not like he put his dick in you. Like you couldn't even get pregnant or anything. He just touched you. I don't even know why we call it sexual assault."

  1. Canada has never had the population density of Europe. You'd need to correct for population density to do apples to apples.

  2. The schools were one part of a genocidal system which had other parts.

  3. The purpose of the schools was to eradicate a culture. Due to many actions (and also some accidents), the native population was already depressed. This wasn't "genocide from scratch." It was finishing the job.

Though many deaths were due to disease which nobody (at first) intentionally spread, make no mistake that there was a genocide across the entire Americas. People came to the Americas and killed, directly or indirectly, millions of its inhabitants. That's genocide.

2

Redbanabandana t1_iu6hex5 wrote

If you think residential schools is on the same level as Holocaust and Apartheid, I don't know what to tell you. It must be confusing at the store when $1 and $2,000 is the same to you.

>Though many deaths were due to disease which nobody (at first) intentionally spread, make no mistake that there was a genocide across the entire Americas. People came to the Americas and killed, directly or indirectly, millions of its inhabitants. That's genocide.

Why would Canada even acknowledge anything that happened before Canada even existed?

−1

Prometheus720 t1_iu6vdxb wrote

Are you deliberately not reading what I wrote?

Let me direct you to anotherof my comments.

2

Redbanabandana t1_iu73bkq wrote

Yeah, no. Residential schools are to genocide as manslaughter is to murder. Two different bad things.

1

Prometheus720 t1_iu6vmck wrote

How are you putting Apartheid up there with the Holocaust while skipping over huge genocides like Armenia?

Apartheid is about as apples to apples with residential schools as anything mentioned so far in this thread

2

Redbanabandana t1_iu72y0n wrote

Was I supposed to provide an exhaustive list of all genocides?

1

Prometheus720 t1_iu7wqm2 wrote

No, you're supposed to have one standard for what you're willing to compare to the Holocaust. You appear to have 2 separate standards.

1

Cherios_Are_My_Shit t1_iu2srbj wrote

not that it's much better but that's not exactly what usually happens.

it's usually more like "never again ... well, that doesn't count"

post-nazi genocides have always had some excuse: we're saving them by converting them to the true faith, it's not wiping a culture out if we only sterilize people, nobody knew that they needed water to continue farming.

saying oopsy would be like admitting guilt so countries don't do that. the canadian government doing it here is actually somewhat progressive, all things considered

21

Cobbertson t1_iu38nmx wrote

Why bother comparing them? Genocide happened in the past and happens to this day in various countries. All we can do is acknowledge it happened, stop it when it's going on, and try to prevent it from happening again. People do twisted shit, and good people have to find out and do whatever is needed at any given moment to promote fairness and inclusivity whenever possible

10

Cherios_Are_My_Shit t1_iu49dhq wrote

>Why bother comparing them?

because "those who don't learn about history are doomed to repeat it" and comparing them is our moral obligation.

>All we can do is acknowledge it happened, stop it when it's going on, and try to prevent it from happening again.

comparing and contrasting is step one. you can't do any of that other stuff if the average person doesn't even really understand what "it" even is.

not gonna sugarcoat it, either i missed the point of your comment or it was a really dumb thing to say. i read it like saying, "what's the point in exercising and dieting? all we can do is try to be in the best shape we can and live a healthy life." i feel like you asked why we should do something and then listed the reasons we should do it.

4

Redbanabandana t1_iu4pz6u wrote

Residential schools: up to around 4,100 deaths over 120 years with most happening before 1950's and mostly from things like lack of care, disease outbreaks (typhoid and tuberculosis) and fires. This represents about 5% of the people that attended the residential schools. The intent of those schools were to assimilate the children into western culture (presumably alive).

Holocaust: 6 million deaths over 4 years by systematic mass murders through nerve gas, combustion chambers and executions. The intent was to kill all Jews. Up to two thirds of the entire Europeen population of Jews were murdered.

People downvoting facts they don't like, lol

1

xyon21 t1_iu4sb07 wrote

Cultural genocide is still genocide. The schools were not meant to physically eradicate first nations people, but they were explicitly created and operated with the intent of eradicating first nations peoples as a cultural group.

8

Redbanabandana t1_iu4tp7a wrote

> Cultural genocide is still genocide

By name, not by definition

−4

Cherios_Are_My_Shit t1_iu5890f wrote

>The definition contained in Article II of the Convention describes genocide as a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part.

destruction of language or literature, banning of clothing or foods, rules against public congregation have all been ruled genocide by the UN.

saying cultural genocide isn't genocide is like saying oral rape isn't rape

2

Redbanabandana t1_iu5kcaz wrote

Putting cultural genocide on the same level as genocide is like saying an unwanted kiss on the cheek is the same as being forcibly penetrated by a chainsaw

>The definition contained in Article II of the Convention describes genocide as a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part.

The bolded part is pretty important.

>destruction of language or literature, banning of clothing or foods, rules against public congregation have all been ruled genocide by the UN.

Oh, like during the pandemic? TIL I was genocided according to the UN

BTW, the convention linked in the article makes no mention of cultural genocide or what that could mean so...

−3

Culverin t1_iu46stq wrote

The oopsie comes with liability.

Legally and financially. Good on the Canadian government.

Immigrant taxpayers will pay for this, I can accept that.

My family was not involved in causing this. But, it's part of being Canadian and the heritage of this country. We benefit from living in Canada and we should pay our due.

What about the Catholic Church? They're going to get a free pass on this aren't they? Because if they capitulate here, they set a precedent around the would, and that is very bad for them cause they don't exactly have clean hands.

8

braedizzle t1_iu498vt wrote

And a big piece to consider is no one currently in HoC would have been around to approve residential schools when they started. This is a different generation coming to terms and declaring that genocide happened at the hands of their predecessors

3

GlitteringHighway t1_iu5wcbs wrote

Better “oopsy we did a genocide” then not acknowledging it. Not to mention genocide has a broader definition then a lot of people realize.

2

BiBoFieTo t1_iu2tolk wrote

Hey - this was a long time ago. The residential schools closed in... wait what the fuck... 1996? We had the internet!

38

Cobbertson t1_iu38tao wrote

The vast majority were closed long before that, but yes, there is no excuse for the fact that it was never taught in school up until a few years ago

14

KatsumotoKurier t1_iu3p354 wrote

Would you consider 2006 a few years ago, in this context? Because I was in Grade 6 then and we learned about it at that time. I even did a short project presentation in my social studies class which was partly on residential schooling. Maybe my school just happened to be ahead of the curb here though, but I kinda doubt that. And even then, I’m quite confident that my parents (both boomers) knew all about this well over 20 years ago too.

10

Prax416 t1_iu453ki wrote

I was also in Grade 6 in 2006 and didn’t learn shit about residential schools until I was in university.

5

spirit-mush t1_iu51wnn wrote

I went to Catholic grade school in the Toronto area in the 90’s and distinctly remember being told about the residential schools in a 5th grade history class. I remember feeling and inherently knowing that it was wrong even though the teachers acted like it was normal to take children away from their families and forbid them from speaking their language. My experience in Catholic school was terrible. I’ve never met more cruel and unchristian people.

5

KatsumotoKurier t1_iu5ahpo wrote

I went to a kinda fundamentalist Protestant private school (which was chiefly attended and operated by United Church members), and as one of the few people from a Catholic background, I can remember two occasions where I was explicitly mocked and derided for my family’s faith from staff members there. I will never forget that. It was so humiliating and insulting. Overzealous, insecure adults going on power trips about how their only somewhat different brand of the same religion is superior to 10 and 12 year olds. Super pathetic.

Other students there never cared for anything like that, because most of the kids there couldn’t even tell you what denomination their family was. But lemme tell you as a Catholic at a Protestant school, it was no distinct pleasure being there and in the crosshairs when those over-religious nutjobs showed their true beliefs.

I’m an atheist now though, and have firmly been for about 15 years. I was always hesitant and sceptical — I even remember in Grade 1 we were read a cartoon, kid-friendly version of the Adam and Eve story in the school library, and I distinctly recall thinking it was nonsensical and far-fetched. Obviously one can’t adequately express that at all at such an age, but I never firmly believed. Of course I had to keep that shit a tight secret. Regardless, what will irk me until the end of my days is the lengthy rap sheet of crimes the Catholic church committed over centuries. It is truly and deeply disgusting. I am so glad to no longer be affiliated with that horrible institution, which is all lovey-dovey now, but only is because it can no longer arrest, torture, or execute us for not believing in its dogma.

2

KatsumotoKurier t1_iu56xoq wrote

I’m from the GTA, which is pretty much determinable as the most left-leaning socio-political reach in the whole country, so I can imagine that maybe influenced why the topic was discussed for me back then. Hbu?

I should mention that this was not covered at great length. I would say probably only a few classes were spent mentioning it. We spent more time talking about Rosa Parks and MLK Jr during black history month (February) the year before in Gr 5.

1

Prax416 t1_iu57vvc wrote

I went to elementary school in the GTA (in Toronto itself) as well.

Maybe it’s a YMMV thing or maybe my school just didn’t bother - I learned about Rosa Parks and MLK too, and we definitely spent a few lessons talking about First Nations (I remember doing a project on Woodland Cree haha) but I can’t remember this particular topic coming up. Who knows, lol.

Anyway, this was 16 years ago, chances are the kids in school today might have a better understanding given access to knowledge, information sharing, social media etc. I think the first time I used Wikipedia was also in 2006, before that I had to use Encarta or go to my local Toronto Public Library.

1

KatsumotoKurier t1_iu58zh0 wrote

Dude! I did my aforementioned project on the Plains Cree people(s) and of the central Canadian prairies! High five!

>kids in school today might have a better understanding given access to knowledge, information sharing, social media etc.

Yes, absolutely. The world is really at our fingertips with the internet. It’s never been a better time to be a curious learner.

>I think the first time I used Wikipedia was also in 2006

Ah yeah, those were the days. Probably the exact same year of first use for me too. Back when every teacher disavowed Wikipedia as being this grossly unreliable source. Funny how it has now become a globally revered one. Even just a few years ago when I was doing my master’s, I occasionally had professors either openly using Wikipedia themselves or referring someone to use it. It is a fantastic and incredible utility — imperfect from time to time, but it is devoutly moderated and a place where one can almost always find substation from reliable source material, especially for larger and more popular topics.

1

Vannilazero t1_iu396sk wrote

Can someone explain what a residential school is?

17

Badpancakes t1_iu3cpev wrote

In short the Catholic Church and Canadian government stole indigenous children and put them in “schools” to strip them of their culture and language. These schools were filled with abuse, rape, and murder of the children.

Recently they started finding all the unmarked graves, and I think the total so far is around 1700 children found.

The last residential school was closed in 1996, and only in the last 10 or so years has it started being taught in public schools.

53

Vannilazero t1_iu3cub4 wrote

Jesus Christ yeah that’s genocide

30

KatsumotoKurier t1_iu3r9wf wrote

So I really, really don’t want to be that guy, but it’s important to discuss that the numbers are still pretty uncertain. See this comment from a few months ago, for example, which highlights some of the issues.

Furthermore, the unmarked graves are not so much unmarked graves as they are graveyards which used to have markings but which now no longer do. These sites were well known to their respective local communities before the enormous news and headline eruptions of the last year. Part of the reason many of these are unmarked today is because out in the prairies especially, headstones were historically very expensive and difficult to acquire. Wooden crosses were erected for the dead — a practice that was still common out that way until around the 1960s, I believe, for virtually everyone. So basically all of the graves were actually marked in the past, and the crosses removed after they deteriorated. Nothing out of the norm for old graveyards. Cadmus Delorme, Chief of the Cowessess First Nation, has even publicly asked people to stop calling these “mass graves” because they simply aren’t what those words imply, but rather just regular graveyards, albeit unmarked.

Speaking of virtually everyone — one of the major problems I personally have had with all this news is that many of the news sites/stations even misreported these as mass graves. Mass grave implies mass murder, and bodies being callously dumped into a hole in the ground. This is not the case for a single one of these sites, and furthermore, many of them are/were normal community graveyards used by peoples of both white settler and indigenous extraction, adults and children alike. Furthermore, to date insofar as I am aware, not a single body has been confirmed as a specifically indigenous child, partly because exhumations have not been made, and because the ground penetrating radar can often even misread tree roots in a similar way to human bodies. And those numbers are the graveyard totals, many of which may very well be of deceased white people who were local to those community graveyards.

Was residential schooling wrong? Absolutely, yes. Were its intentions wrong and did they pursue a policy of intentional cultural genocide? Once again, absolutely yes. But do we know everything clearly enough to determine how many children died? Actually unfortunately no, we do not know that. Hopefully that can be conclusively determined in the future, but for now, there is actually and sadly a shocking amount of misinformation out there revolving around this issue. And there are still other things out there surrounding the issue which need to be further investigated too.

28

Caligullama t1_iu4huvv wrote

Don’t apologize. Definitely be that guy or else you have disingenuous users like /u badpancakes spreading bs and people taking it as unequivocal fact.

5

ImpressiveGrass3206 t1_iu3o50p wrote

I’ve met few survivors and I’ll tell you many of the First Nation people think their life is worthless.. one guy I met said his family had like wine cellar hidden under rug and when ever the RCMP (federal police) would show up with members of the Catholic Church they would round up children and take them away and his family hide all the older kids and gave him up and was abused physically and mentally. He cries in his sleep and it the most heartbreaking thing.

14

Stuvivor t1_iu4b1u8 wrote

A residential school survivor spoke at my school around 2010. She said, when she tried speaking her Indigenous language, they hammered a nail through her tongue, so now, when she speaks her language, she feels her tongue tingle from the memory.

10

Redbanabandana t1_iu4pizd wrote

Most deaths happened before the 1950's and were because of typhoid fever and turberculosis outbreaks and fires.

1

Strykker2 t1_iu5p8o3 wrote

I will correct you on the years taught thing, since I was taught about them in the early-mid 2000s, but yes it has not been very long. and really going from 10 years to about 15 isn't a very good look either.

2

Badpancakes t1_iu5pgpf wrote

I’ve noticed that it varies from school district to school district. I graduated in 2008 and it wasn’t even mentioned, but I see some people were taught. I think it was made mandatory across Canada in the last decade or so though

2

Strykker2 t1_iu5pre2 wrote

yeah thats probably the case, it was covered in my early grade 5-7 history classes around 2005 or so.

2

spirit-mush t1_iu4zyyj wrote

Not just the Roman Catholic Church but also the United, Anglican, Presbyterian, and Methodist Churches participated and ran schools. Many Christian denominations are implicated in these atrocities.

1

Rhannmah t1_iu66cee wrote

This read is interesting, but

>Moreover, how can one think that entire groups of religious men and women dedicated to high moral standards could conspire to commit such sordid crimes without dissent and not even a single whistleblower?

That sentence takes the cake of the many dubious biases the writer clearly has.

1

[deleted] t1_iu32k5c wrote

[deleted]

13

arxeef t1_iu46se4 wrote

Pope said the same, although a little quietly iirc

3

DrDroid t1_iu47zfe wrote

Except the Pope already said it was genocide

3

EdithDich OP t1_iuaxflt wrote

Which is also clearly explained in the article but why read an article when twentyfuckingletters can just shitpost.

2

EdithDich OP t1_iuaxga9 wrote

Maybe you should read the article before commenting.

1

TheBig2na t1_iu2tzlh wrote

So when do those responsible get held accountable for said genocide? Every politician, priest, nun, cook, etc that were involved should be charged with genocide. Just following orders isn’t an excuse. It was just a job is not an excuse. Lock them all up for their crimes.

10

SirLucan11 t1_iu2zsg8 wrote

All of this is just performative. And the list of everyone having anything to do with the school systems would be in the thousands maybe in the 2060s they'll arrest an extremely old priest and lock him up for a year and call it justice and moving forward from the past. Like what they do in Germany.

11

TheBig2na t1_iu5m8i1 wrote

Exactly. Let’s call it what it is but not treat it as genocide. Naming it should make all of the families feel much better. Right? Disgusting

1

guy314159 t1_iu3lazl wrote

Most of the nazis that survived the actual war weren't punished by the allies so you think they would lock those people up? (In japan they didn't even acknowledged their war crimes to this day and they were under us occupation for 8 years after the war)

3

Prometheus720 t1_iu6var7 wrote

Real fast:

If you are unwilling to call something "genocide" unless it was as bad as the literal most egregious example in history, you are bad at the fundamental life skills of defining things and using categories.

The Holocaust is not the criteria set for a genocide. It is not the mark something must pass to qualify as a genocide. It is literally the most brutal example in history.

This is like not calling something black unless it is darker than Vantablack.

3

Redbanabandana t1_iu74jxq wrote

>the fundamental life skills of defining things and using categories.

No shit, use one category for intentional mass murder like the holocaust and another category for unintentional mass deaths related to lack of ressources/negligence like the residential school system. They shouldn't be in the same category because they aren't the same.

How ironic that you're saying other people suck at categorizing things, lol

0

nanoatzin t1_iu4ro7x wrote

Would be nice if the US did this.

But no. The wealthy that stole from the natives will bribe anyone to stop that.

2

Scorpion1024 t1_iu3x7vo wrote

Where’s the “save the children” wankers now?

−10

Whyherro2 t1_iu4m867 wrote

What the fuck? Fuck you. Absolutely fuck you.

6

Scorpion1024 t1_iu4ragx wrote

Funny how “away” didn’t have a thing to say when those graves were unearthed. But save us from Tom Hanks!

−3

c-two-the-d t1_iu485bv wrote

I think public schooling, in general, should be thought of this way.

−18

Whyherro2 t1_iu4mftu wrote

Are children these days forcibly taken from their homes and put into a boarding schools to live until their culture has been completely stripped from them?

5

c-two-the-d t1_iu4rqap wrote

No, and there’s no genocide in regard to killing, except in killing free will, creativity, and the right to be an individual. They ARE, however, forced to go to schools that teach them confusion, where everything is out of context with the real world. They’re taught too much: the orbiting of planets, the law of large numbers, slavery, adjective, architectural, drawing, dance, gymnasium, choral, singing, assemblies, s BBC urprise, guests, fire drills, computer language is, parents night, staff development days, pull out programs, guidance with strangers, that students may never see again, standardized tests, age segregation, unlike anything seen in the outside world… what do those have in common with one another?

They’re taught classism a through class position. They must stay in the class where they belong, they’re numbered so that if any get away, they can be returned to the right class. They are locked together with other children who bare numbers (grade level, test scores/ etc.) like their own. They’re taught to be in a marching order and to know their place. They’re told that their test scores will make employers hire them more easily based on how well they do.

They’re taught indifference, to not care too much about anything because once they get really going on something, the bell rings, and they have to just drop it and move onto the next thing whatever unrelated thing that is… The lesson of the bells.

They’re taught emotional dependency by stars, red check, smiles, and frowns, prizes, honors, and disgraces. They’re taught to surrender their will to the predestined chain of command. Rights may be granted or withheld by any authority without appeal because rights do not exist inside of the school not even the right of free speech as a Supreme Court has ruled unless school authorities say they do.

They’re taught intellectual dependency; good students wait for a teacher to tell them what to do is the most important in life lesson of all. We must all wait for other people better train than ourselves to make the meanings of our lives. The expert makes all the important choices only I can determine what my kids must study says the teacher , successful children do the thinking I assign them with a minimum of resistance when the decent show of enthusiasm.

They’re taught provisional self-esteem by getting a report card sent home to illicit approval through tiny percentage points, think of how dissatisfied with a child a parent should be. Good schooling depends on perpetuating dissatisfaction, just like the commercial economy depends on the same fertilizer.

They are taught they can’t hide they’re always being watched. There’s no private spaces for children and there’s no private time for them. They’re encouraged to tattle on each other even tattle in their own parents. They’re given an extended type of schooling called homework, so that the effect of surveillance, if not, the surveillance itself travels in the private household, where students might otherwise, he’s free time to learn something unauthorized from a mother and father by exploration her by apprenticing to some wise person in the neighborhood disloyalty that idea of schooling is a devil, always ready to find work for idle hands.

It is the great triumph of compulsory government, monopoly, math schooling that, among even the best of teachers in among even the best students only a small number can imagine a different way of doing things.

It is a slow genocide of the people, that’s what our current education system is.

−10