Comments
zxc123zxc123 t1_j6oqynq wrote
This. What kind of regard would lock in 3% for 30 years if they know they can lock in 4% or 5% if they wait 6-12 months instead?
EWJWNNMSG t1_j6pc769 wrote
Or you keep the bond part of your portfolio in something like 25% long bonds and lock the 3.5% in the 10 right now and 75% t-bill and then as the fed keeps getting to 5% you continue aggressively transitioning from the short end to the long end, I would already go beyond 50% of the portfolio if you actually get 4%. You know, as the pros are doing. I'm not of course but that's only because I don't like money
[deleted] t1_j6p2kwe wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6opmer wrote
[removed]
Meat__Head t1_j6ns7qn wrote
Rug pull incoming
__Squirrel_Girl__ t1_j6oo7d6 wrote
Oriental?
Meat__Head t1_j6oo9zn wrote
Persian
yao97ming t1_j6p9lub wrote
Rug pull up?
Meat__Head t1_j6p9str wrote
Pull out
mrmrmrj t1_j6ohupx wrote
This does not mean these hedge funds believe bonds will fall. Shorting Treasuries is cheap leverage. This means HFs are boosting gross exposure to chase this market.
SuspiciousStable9649 t1_j6pj01v wrote
I was looking for someone to find a way to say this clearly means the opposite of what the chart implies.
VisualMod t1_j6noqkz wrote
You're right, traders have never been this bearish on Treasuries. The aggregate net non-commercial futures contracts is currently at -1 million contracts, which is a record low. This indicates that there is a high level of skepticism among market participants about the future direction of Treasury prices.
^^Discord ^^BanBets ^^VoteBot ^^FAQ ^^Leaderboard ^^- ^^Keep_VM_Alive
Aramedlig t1_j6oi3vt wrote
So the institutions are the ones causing the inversion. Nothing says controlling the recession narrative better than this.
lawbotamized t1_j6o9a47 wrote
ELI5?
Stack_Silver t1_j6nr94k wrote
Either hubris or planned.
My bet is on planned.
y90210 t1_j6nq0tb wrote
Sounds like the same hopium the markets have had (with price increasing) that fed will pivot.
[deleted] t1_j6nrqbd wrote
[deleted]
Dothemath2 t1_j6nrxcw wrote
Why though? Yields to go up because they are betting inflation is not under control? Doesn’t seem to make sense? Are they thinking massive outflows from treasuries to stocks or maybe US government debt issues or possible default or near default? I think the US will turn itself inside out before they default.
[deleted] t1_j6o7u2y wrote
If inflation is not under control the fed will continue to hike rates which drops bonds prices and raises yields
Dothemath2 t1_j6oizy1 wrote
Isn’t inflation under control? Month over month, it’s at 2%. Having said that I am neck deep in puts because I think earnings will go down.
RowPuzzleheaded3590 t1_j6or7oi wrote
Yes. And there’s several models that suggest recession is either happening or imminent.
But the fed is still hiking to cause unemployment so they can rug pull the economy and the rich can buy everything up, then drop rates for the wealthy to refinance the debt cheaper. And so US gov doesn’t have high treasury interest rates
Dothemath2 t1_j6pdtj6 wrote
I get it now! Bond market at these levels pricing in a Fed pivot, 2nd half 2023, not higher rates through 2024. Essentially if no pivot then yield rates go up, bond prices go down.
[deleted] t1_j6ojr49 wrote
It’s not under control yet
[deleted] t1_j6numdc wrote
[removed]
SproutedWinkle t1_j6o4m6a wrote
Counter party risk. That’s all I’m gunna say.
Waddayanow t1_j6ogpa3 wrote
Come on, don’t tease us. Share your wisdom. USA default?
SproutedWinkle t1_j6oqlkn wrote
No lol, I don’t even know what I was saying I just wanted it to sound vague and ominous.
Sorry-Business-1152 t1_j6ohqzx wrote
Bodybag314 t1_j6ns0fu wrote
The question then comes to mind. Can it be squeezed?
Sadoksad t1_j6o8y5a wrote
Convincing monkeys to buy equities is relatively easy than convincing them to buy treasuries.
VisualMod t1_j6noptg wrote
User Report | |||
---|---|---|---|
Total Submissions | 0 | First Seen In WSB | 1 year ago |
Total Comments | 478 | Previous Best DD | |
Account Age | 2 years | [^scan ^comment ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_comment&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20comment%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20comment%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) | [^scan ^submission ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_submission&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20submission%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20submission%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) |
^^Discord ^^BanBets ^^VoteBot ^^FAQ ^^Leaderboard ^^- ^^Keep_VM_Alive
[deleted] t1_j6nzncu wrote
[removed]
tehs1mps0ns t1_j6o09ev wrote
And yet US10Y back down at 3.5% ??
[deleted] t1_j6ozckl wrote
[deleted]
spxscalper t1_j6pf14h wrote
It has nothing to do with a pivot or anything else
It's because a particularly regarded political party is willing to default on debt to own the libs
They know it, I know it, everyone knows it. That's the problem with playing with fire. You don't think a guy like Santos isn't willing to blow up the system for personal attention?
They are going to let it go to the last minute. But now all it takes is one house chucklefuck to call for a speaker revote at the wrong time.
That's why shorting treasuries is so OP
[deleted] t1_j6nqmfo wrote
Traders are betting yields will go higher with future rate hikes and hawkishness. They don’t expect a pivot