Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

cesvilmal t1_j6lns1x wrote

Reply to comment by mlamping in Mercedes vs Tesla Self Driving by mlamping

It's 100% a sensing problem. I work in the industry. But I guess no use arguing with a fanboy who thinks "single modality" is an outlandish term but unironically says "neural nets"

I'm sorry Elon took you for your pre paid fsd.

Disclaimer: I hold no positions, short or long, in that dumpster fire of a company.

7

mlamping OP t1_j6lord0 wrote

If we battled credentials, I’d bet you wouldn’t hold a candle to me.

But I digress. “Single modality” sounds like 2008 wants their machine learning and hand crafted features selection. Assuming you meant the use of different types of senors. Because Tesla neural network stack is a multi modal, multi task, multi net. But I’m assuming you know that already because “you work in the industry”.

We both here, so we’re both regards, so to anyone reading this wondering who is right, google Andrej kaparthy or any ai expert like lex Friedman.

And don’t believe idiots like above

5

cesvilmal t1_j6lpziy wrote

Well autonomous driving and computer vision are literally what I get paid to do every day... And weird you keep flexing other people's achievements...

It's not a matter of machine learning, the world mapping required for fsd is simply not possible with 2d pixel maps. It doesn't matter what algorithms or AI you have, the data you are feeding it is inherently not enough. Both waymo and cruise realized the gigantic blindspot of cameras a long time ago, are you really going to deny they are the leaders in autonomy?

Anyway, you keep at it bud, I'm sure Elon will reward the most loyal of his cultists when he inevitably takes over with his army of Tesla robots. Oh wait, those were a fucking fraud too.

6

mlamping OP t1_j6lqeuo wrote

2d pixel maps?

What are you even talking about? Tesla does video stitching of multiple cameras, 3d video into the neural net. You don’t even know what your talking about.

They’re close to end to end models and have the training data for training this, which will be their next release. Including path finding in the neural net versus A* search, which every self driving startup is doing

You still in 2d images doing classification, I learned that shit in 2012. Catch-up. Object detection is near 99.999% hence why your original comments show how out of touch you are, or that you really don’t know what you’re saying

3

cesvilmal t1_j6lr3yj wrote

Oh boy... You've listened to a few too many podcast and clearly don't understand the state of the art in sensors and sensor fusion. Good luck bud.

7

mlamping OP t1_j6lrlx0 wrote

If you believe sensing is still a problem in self driving and it’s not the decision making, like I said, you need good-luck.

How is anything I said a podcast? What podcast talks about this stuff?

Again to ppl reading this, all you have to do is search the current ai leaders and see what they say. That’s it. Or read papers that are freely open on the internet of current ideas

Don’t believe this FUD. He probably has puts.

Also don’t believe me either, all this information is freely available.

5

nhaodzo t1_j6lvq9g wrote

I believe you. That dude sounds outdated. I believe decision making is the problem for fsd currently.

−1

Dear_Ebb_5181 t1_j6lqm2j wrote

Hmm… what do you do exactly? Got a link to your github?

−1

cesvilmal t1_j6lrd8s wrote

Not trying to dox myself. My primary focus is on calibration for sensor fusion.

0

Dear_Ebb_5181 t1_j6ltcl0 wrote

I mean with that description, you could be a 15 dollar an hr tech. What experience do you have with machine learning? What experience do you have with modeling and training?

1

cesvilmal t1_j6ltwfr wrote

No, actually I'm just the janitor at the kombucha bar that the engineers frequent. But I overheard them say that Elon bad so here I am.

2

mlamping OP t1_j6lsgo8 wrote

Haha nice one

0

Dear_Ebb_5181 t1_j6lt4xm wrote

Ha.. im genuinely curious as to the work he has done to be such an authority

−1