Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Cwallace98 t1_ja2eu3k wrote

Yay, the Texans got to keep their slaves.

−10

TTVmeatce t1_ja41it7 wrote

you should not be down voted for this

11

Cwallace98 t1_ja428pu wrote

I knew i would though. It was a main reason for the texans revolting.

12

TTVmeatce t1_ja45cp0 wrote

yep. In Texas history we're taught that Texians revolted because Santa Ana violated the constitution of 1824. What they don't teach is that the part he violated was the part that allowed for slavery. Also left out the part where American slave owners/slavery supporters were moved into the state just to help tip the scale.

14

Ameisen t1_ja574tw wrote

Slavery played a part, but the Texan Revolution was a part of a larger, general set of insurrections within Mexico at the time (the Mexican Federalist War) against Santa Anna.

Slavery was absolutely a cause, but the general trigger was the increasing centralization of the Mexican government. It wasn't that they violated the constitution, but that they replaced it with a centralist one in 1835.

10

TTVmeatce t1_jabrq92 wrote

in Texas it was slavery. It was an entire imperialist production by American slave owners

1

justsikko t1_ja55z3p wrote

The vast majority of the soldiers who fought in the battle of San Jacinto didn't even live in Texas before the revolt

4

SirMcCheese t1_ja3j27y wrote

Very clear people are not aware Texas broke away from Mexico at least partially to keep slaver legal. There were other issues they had with Mexico's government, but a very clear effect of the Texans winning was slavery continuing in the area until the U.S. civil war ended.

7

sik0fewl t1_ja5j0sx wrote

Only to join the United States, which would also outlaw slavery. Such bad luck!

4