Submitted by paulfdietz t3_10i5km1 in technology
Different_Access6316 t1_j5da3u4 wrote
It sounds unsound: $9.3 billion for a 462 MW capacity poweplant and $119 per MWh price without subsidies.
Current prices for off shore wind is generally around $4000 per KW capacity or $1.8 Billion for 462 MW capacity poweplant. So basically you still have $7.5 billion left.
24 hours of battery storage is around $2000 per KW capacity, and around $1 billion for 24 hrs backup of a 462 MW load
In practice Off-shore, can be much cheaper, a recent project was $1.4 billion for 600 MW capacity, and a $55 per MWh price.
So basically the final per MWh price projection of the NuScale project with government subsidies has progressed like this:
2016: $55 per MWh
2021: $58 per MWh
2023: $89 per MWh (or $119 MWh without government subsidies)
On shore wind is around $32 per MWh
Off shore wind is around $84 per MWh, projected to decline to $60 by 2030
-The_Blazer- t1_j5ekyzy wrote
Besides, it's actually more expensive than traditionally nuclear power, which has a LCOE of about 65$/MWh according to the IPCC and NEA, costs, say, 10 billion to build for a 1600MW power capacity, and performs better than gas power plants in the long term. It turns out there's a good reason nuclear reactors are typically built huge.
paulfdietz OP t1_j5hanp7 wrote
That LCOE for nuclear would involve unrealistic assumptions. The LCOE from Vogtle 3/4 will be much higher than that.
-The_Blazer- t1_j5j2bxe wrote
LCOE isn't calculated on the basis of outliers.
paulfdietz OP t1_j5jrpzr wrote
Apparently it should be computed on the basis of old, irrelevant historical data? Or maybe on the basis of promises on Power Point slides.
Xinlitik t1_j5doab4 wrote
Do you know if the cost of R&D is being included for this reactor? If so, the subsequent reactors would have much more favorable economics
[deleted] t1_j5exgee wrote
[removed]
tickleMyBigPoop t1_j5dzjyc wrote
Not to mention the cost of regulatory compliance
jorge1209 t1_j5eic74 wrote
Sure if more expensive to build than wind, but have you included the cost of the fuel?
therealcobrastrike t1_j5ejtfm wrote
The wind is 100% free fuel source. Not sure how they’re gonna beat that metric.
DonQuixBalls t1_j5j75nd wrote
I read it as a joke.
Illustrious_Crab1060 t1_j5gh2zq wrote
You need to calculate in Energy storage and multiple sites to counter the variability of wind
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments