Submitted by thegravity98ms2 t3_zqhbg5 in technology
jcrreddit t1_j11jcfe wrote
Reply to comment by alt4614 in U.S. lawmakers to include ban on TikTok on government devices - sources by thegravity98ms2
Glad you so simply agree.
alt4614 t1_j11noqe wrote
No. Your premises make sense. But your rationale to "then ban every other..." does not. That's a leap that can be accomplished AFTER we've distanced ourselves from the grasp of China.
jcrreddit t1_j12ehne wrote
It shouldn’t be a specific company banning. There should be laws protecting citizens privacy in general.
alt4614 t1_j12l3la wrote
Well that's just not going to happen without a fundamental change in our constitution or decades of common law protecting data collection at the expense of privacy.
>It shouldn’t be a specific company banning
It should because it must. Or we get nothing, not even national security. Privacy is a pipe dream. National Security is not.
jcrreddit t1_j17icmn wrote
You’ve got a pipe dream if you think the government is doing it for “National Security”. If China also gave them the data, they would be peachy keen with it.
alt4614 t1_j17ij32 wrote
Speak english bro.
But no, it’s not a pipe dream. Tiktok is turning kids brains to mush, and you know it
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments