MangoMind20 t1_izwr7n8 wrote
Reply to comment by prestongraham_412 in China wants legal sector to be AI-powered by 2025 / Supreme People's Court issues directive for an artificial intelligence network to be in place by 2025 to support and enhance legal services by Sorin61
Would it have decision abilities?
Or is it going to be more a piece of software you can ask legal qs to and find similar cases and their decisions?
gortonsfiJr t1_izwrwzg wrote
In the article it says judges still make the decisions
MangoMind20 t1_izwvign wrote
OK cool, seems more of a resource then.
[deleted] t1_izwxitg wrote
[deleted]
QuestionableAI t1_izxosyc wrote
In China ... sure they do, once they are given permission.
reddy-or-not t1_izwrpwo wrote
That already exists, databases with various legal resources and prior decisions. Been around online since the 1990s
MangoMind20 t1_izwrvm4 wrote
The kind I'm envisioning would work at the level of chatgpt. Are modern ones as good as that?
Pick_one_card t1_izxeiqy wrote
I mean chatgpt isn’t even good right now. It’s great at bullshitting and making something that SOUNDS correct.
MangoMind20 t1_izxf41b wrote
It's functionality is much better than the legal databases I've been using. I'd like to see the two married with it able to for e.g. pull up 5 most relevant cases and a small blurb highlighting the relevant decisions within those cases for any given legal issue I pose to it.
Accomplished_Bonus74 t1_izxhhhl wrote
And before that there were archives of… you know… books
putsch80 t1_izxpeik wrote
In the US, we have multiple ones. Westlaw and Lexis are the two oldest and most prominent. They were originally print services, but went digital in the mid 1990s (maybe before). Bloomberg Law is now coming into the fray. All of those are pay services used by law firms and are typically fairly expensive. There are lower cost services like Fast Case, but the search ability isn’t as good as the more expensive services.
Source: am lawyer.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments