Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_ja75ixf wrote

Reply to comment by WarriorZombie in A Photographer Who Found Instagram Fame for His Striking Portraits Has Confessed His Images Were Actually A.I.-Generated by PauloPatricio

> They are very artistic, not going to lie

They are very not artistic, not going to lie. Bland are very generic; as if a AI bot made the - oh wait

1

knigitz t1_ja7g0iq wrote

Art is subjective, bro. You're arguing opinions here.

9

[deleted] t1_ja7k1py wrote

Art is also objective.

Ignoring the act of creation and the artist and their tools, is a mocking of art and its creation.

You're the one being very ignorant and narrow minded. Art is so much more than just "subjective opinion".

Bro

−7

knigitz t1_ja7mk54 wrote

No one is ignoring traditional art or its journey.

But you are ignoring decades of science and technology advancements leading us here, ideas that rang in ears likely before you were even born. You are ignoring countless hours of research and development across numerous organizations, companies, universities, and individuals, the developed workflows of modern web apps, and hundreds of open source libraries working together to reach today's result. You are also ignoring the fact that many artists are actually pro AI workflows. You're stuck in the past.

AI art can be beautiful, especially when you put that tool in a digital artist's hands. You just aren't looking hard enough, or are squinting your eyes shut in disbelief when you witness it.

I'm not attacking traditional art. So only one of us here is being ignorant and a narrow minded bigot (you).

7

[deleted] t1_ja7mur7 wrote

You have no experience of how industrial art really works, do you :)

There's nothing to say, because you have the usual reddit armchair stance on this lol. You have basically no clue what you're talkink about.

−3