Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

EcoAffinity t1_iuixli0 wrote

Nope, I've lived in small and big cities out West, and I still visit out there yearly, but I'll only keep it visits unless I get a substantial raise that's above and beyond. Growing up, my mindset was different, but I definitely appreciate Springfield now that I've moved back and I'm more involved in the community and have a group of similar-minded friends as a late 20s adult. Out west, like in Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Denver, San Francisco, I see a lot of sadness in the permanent and growing homeless populations. Everyone is being priced out unless they have generational benefits like homes or pooling resources.

Springfield has shitty aspects of it, but that happens everywhere, including the far right&religious groups that pisses a lot of people off. But Springfield offers a great cost of living mixed with enough amenities that life isn't too bad. We've got some amazing access to the public outdoors, like Greenway trails, lakes, and rivers; and we have some really great hikes within 1-2 hours. We don't have natural resource challenges to the degree the West is increasingly having (water, energy, climate change effects). We have all the major consumer amenities (Costco, fancy whole foods type stores, movie theaters, decent accessible airport), and major concerts/shows are just a few hours away. Plus we've got a dozen decent breweries, a decent downtown that continues to improve, and a great restaurant scene if they can survive the coming recession 🙃

I have found that inserting myself into the community through volunteering and civic engagement really increased my feelings of wanting to fight for the good I see in Springfield. We have a lot of people in the trenches who are always fighting for a better Springfield.

46

Embarrassed_Feed_145 t1_iujzby0 wrote

so good and i fully agree! i could never take this cost of living for granted 🥲

3

[deleted] t1_iujgltl wrote

[deleted]

1

imbrucy t1_iujklry wrote

I'd be curious to see your data. Everything I have seen shows Springfield below both KC and STL. It might have grown more in Q3 than those, but I believe it's still less in absolute numbers.

4

bobone77 t1_iujx0nj wrote

I read the headline wrong a few months ago, it seems. We were 3rd highest among metro areas, so still behind KC and STL.

1

EcoAffinity t1_iujoadb wrote

I'm not aware of that, and I would like to see your sources for that information. I find it interesting that cost of living would be calculated on a quarterly basis as I would think some of the factors are better determined on a longer scale.

Nevertheless, I think KC and StL, while similar in basic living costs, sacrifice some things that I enjoy in Springfield. Commute, safety, and proximity to outdoor recreation, to name a few.

2