Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Birdhawk t1_jbi5x70 wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Tiger Woods' girlfriend asks judge to resolve dispute over NDA. by PrincessBananas85

Hold up, dating someone for a few years entitles me to take a chunk out of their bank account even though I did nothing to earn them that money? Word.

291

[deleted] t1_jbi6fr3 wrote

Amber Heard has entered the chat.

131

[deleted] t1_jbi6jxv wrote

Johnny Depp has left the chat.

58

uristmcderp t1_jbipdqd wrote

It's weird how getting married then divorced makes that true.

12

Cows_Go_Huh t1_jbjgojf wrote

That’s not what the spirit of the law implies. People getting divorced and someone owing alimony is in place because typically the husband is the breadwinner and grows wealth for the family, while the wife stays at home and raises the kids. Takes care of the house. And puts her working career on hold or never develops one. I assure you she wasn’t slaving over a hot stove with a baby in her arms while the other was tugging at her waiting for tiger to get home. Just being with someone doesn’t mean you won a jack pot.

14

drdrillaz t1_jbknvu3 wrote

But she did likely give up her career and did help with his kids. They weren’t “just dating”. They lived together for 6 years. She may not be entitled to something but a billionaire should give her something when they split so she can get back on her feet and establish her career again. I’ve lived with my gf for 3 years and there’s zero chance I’d kick her out with nothing. Tiger should look at it as buying peace and silence. A million or two is literally .001 of his net worth. It’s maybe a days worth of interest on his portfolio.

−3

Cows_Go_Huh t1_jbks7on wrote

I’d bet the plethora of Nanny’s would beg to differ. Not to mention the time with their mom. She wasn’t doing much child rearing. Also, she could have worked. She chose not to. She didn’t need to be at one of his many homes or vacation houses or ride around in luxury cars let alone pay for shit. She didn’t want to work, at a time where she could have literally lived her dream out. She expected to be taken care of because she just was with him. She could have been doing literally anything to have her own money and made something of her self rather than expect a hand out. Also, you want him to just give her what he’s earned on his back. Regardless of how small it is to him is absurd. Especially after her wanting out of the NDA she signed so she can…earn money off HIM. Not what she’s worked for. Not what she has contributed. Off Tiger being a massive celebrity.

Is your gf helping you raise a kid? Is she taking care of the house?

3

PPLifter t1_jbim574 wrote

In the UK, if you live with someone in a house they own then it actually does.

3

drdrillaz t1_jbj4hjk wrote

To be fair, she did help repair his image. It was pretty much in shambles before he started dating her

−30

ZachLagreen t1_jbki9mu wrote

What did she do to help repair his image?

4

drdrillaz t1_jbkkt1r wrote

Remember this?. They came out as a couple shortly after this. She was seen as a wholesome normal girl. People were praising Tiger for finding someone normal to date. They quickly forgot about the DUI and all his previous transgressions. That being said, $30M is ridiculous. But I’ve lived with my gf for 3 years and even I would give her $20k to get a place to live. If he really just kicked her out with nothing then he deserves all the negative pr

−5

ZachLagreen t1_jbknv5d wrote

So being a wholesome girl and dating someone with a troubled past entitles you to money...? I don't really follow the logic there.

We also have no clue the details of the breakup, so I don't know how you can definitively say what levels of pr he deserves.

Just a bizarre take all around.

3