Submitted by jarvedttudd t3_zvvjh2 in space
WilliedeFoe t1_j1sbd0m wrote
Reply to comment by bubblesculptor in Meet the amateur astronomer who found a lost NASA satellite by jarvedttudd
He found the needle in the haystack! Out of the hundreds, if not thousands, of satellites in orbit! Very Sci-fi 👏. I'm glad he did...I wonder if he knows how many fall down a year.
YourLocal_FBI_Agent t1_j1tph98 wrote
From a quick google search, just copypasting the top result so don't at me on the accuracy plz.
"According to the Index of Objects Launched into Outer Space, maintained by the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), there are 8261 individual satellites orbiting the Earth."
cbarrick t1_j1ufnzi wrote
That's actually less than I expected
virtualmang t1_j1w338n wrote
That’s more than I expected. Hot damn there’s a lot of space junk already
[deleted] t1_j1uunxz wrote
[removed]
FunkyFarmington t1_j1tw2pf wrote
So THAT'S where this bullshit of calling near earth orbit "outer space" comes from. I did not know this.
danielv123 t1_j1u2em9 wrote
I mean, they needed a name and inner space just didn't sound as cool. What can you do.
ngutheil t1_j1vdxaa wrote
Should have called in final space
Alkanen t1_j1u7dlb wrote
Outer space as in outside Earth's atmosphere. That's the definition used in astronomy. Any other use is due to sci-fi authors with a bad grasp on nomenclature.
nickh84 t1_j1u9xjk wrote
Not exactly. It's an arbitrary definition of 100km altitude. As the atmosphere doesn't exactly have an end, and outer space doesn't exactly have a start.
ExaminationBig6909 t1_j1uldm5 wrote
It's not arbitrary, exactly. The Karman line is a theoretical point at which the atmosphere is so thin that you won't get lift from a wing. So it's a point where airplanes cannot reach.
(Also, the original calculation was for 80 km, which is used by the USAF for the boundary of space.)
nickh84 t1_j1uodyx wrote
Its 100% arbitrary. It's a nice round number. Density is variable and 99.99% of planes r not capable of flying anywhere close to that altitude. And even above that altitude the atmosphere can produce significant drag on space craft.
ExaminationBig6909 t1_j1uvek5 wrote
You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.
nickh84 t1_j1xgwfh wrote
your definition can be applied at 80km. Is there any objective difference when u pass from 99km to 100km? No, there isnt. The reason 100km was used is because its a nice round number, thats purely it. It's not because planes cant fly that high, and the atmosphere extends well past 100km. The point is, its just an agreed upon number by an international group to use as a reference point and for legal reasons. Thats arbitrary. Now if u can define the precise difference between 99km and 100km, then its not arbitrary. Good luck with that tho
ExaminationBig6909 t1_j1xk9ql wrote
All right. What's the difference between 79 km and 80?
dsptpc t1_j1vgdyp wrote
And to think Alan Eustace jumped out of a perfectly good balloon just above 41km. Half way to space.
[deleted] t1_j1uek6z wrote
[removed]
MainSailFreedom t1_j1v7p2f wrote
I kinda thought outer space was a term for outside the solar system.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments