Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

wgp3 t1_j190byu wrote

He used the same premise in the book. He also regrets using that premise because it isn't accurate at all. But at the time I don't think he knew how inaccurate it was or he just couldn't write a better scenario. Can't remember. He's talked about it though.

Definitely should read the book. There's a lot more details that really get you experiencing the struggles in a way the movie couldn't convey. Movie was still solid.

5

Sammy81 t1_j19shdj wrote

He doesn’t regret it, and he knew the facts when he wrote it. He said it was just a choice he made for dramatic effect and to get the book going. It’s hard to think of a scenario where astronauts would leave behind one of their own, so he invented one.

I tried to make the book as accurate as I could. The biggest place that’s inaccurate – don’t tell anybody – but if you’re in a dust storm on Mars, you’re not even going to feel it. Mars’ atmosphere is less than one percent of Earth’s. So a 150-km/hour wind would feel like about a 1-km/hour wind does on Earth. It wouldn’t do any damage to anything. Shhh …Most people don’t know how Martian dust storms work, that it’s not like being in a sandblaster. It’s just more dramatic that way. So I just made that concession. [shrugs and smiles] I know I’m a liar. I just … wanted that.

8

StrangeTangerine1525 t1_j1jug0y wrote

Which would be wrong though. Density wise the Martian atmosphere is closer to 2% the density it is on Earth, but wind would still exert roughly 1/9 the force it would here on Earth, not counting low gravity. A 60 mph wind on Mars (fastest average windspeed in a dust storm) would feel like a 7 mph wind on Earth, and could pick up things similar to a 20 mph wind because of the lower gravity. Still probably not enough to pick up a metal tube filled with rock though.

1