Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

a_swarm_of_nuns t1_is4yo6i wrote

Through future years of competition in a capitalist market, prices will cheapen over time

6

Ariolet OP t1_is4z7vf wrote

Agreed, the price will definitely decrease, it’s just hard for me to see how they could ever get the price to a point where an average person could afford it. I hope it does, just seems very difficult to achieve.

2

a_swarm_of_nuns t1_is51n89 wrote

Yea. Unless we figure out an alternative to rocket fuel, that is a large component of what drives the price.

I don’t think it will ever be cheap, but space tourism like what Branson did with virgin galactic (almost like a plane entering the upper atmospheres will be cheaper than sitting aboard a rocket ship)

0

CatastropheJohn t1_is52932 wrote

I’m cycling to save the planet, while others are planning to ride rockets for fun.

Thisisfine.jpg

3

Adeldor t1_is5mapl wrote

Propellant contributes very little to current launch expenses. Vehicle and infrastructure costs dwarf it. For example, it costs SpaceX less than $20 million to launch a Falcon 9, yet propellant is only ~$200,000 of that, or around 1%.

Via full reusability and simplified operation, SpaceX hopes with Starship to dramatically reduce expenses to the point where it'll cost only a few million to launch 100 t to LEO.

To illustrate, assume a full Starship will cost $10 million to launch (that's five times Musk's most quoted estimate, just to be conservative). Launching 200 kg then costs $20,000. Still high relative to air transport, but it's getting there.

3