Submitted by fingin t3_zb6f72 in singularity

Humans have an advantage over AI in the form of a priori knowledge (some in-built pattern recognition faculties). As well as dispositions or reactions to sensory and emotional signals. Evolving beings are always using samples to transform themselves. The AI needs to have some implict knowledge, before it can actually "learn" in any sense that a human can. Soon enough, it will outperform most of us in language and image generation tasks. In that case, we should only be concerned about using it rather than dismissing it in favour of human performers. Curious to hear your thoughts

3

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Superschlenz t1_iypsktf wrote

>Humans have an advantage over AI in the form of a priori knowledge

... and AIs have an advantage over humans in the form of perfect mind copying. Once there exists a single AI that has learned the mind, regardless of how long the training took, it's no longer necessary for the other AIs to learn sample-efficiently from raw data again and again when they could just make a 1:1 copy of the first AIs mind. Instead of thinking about how to apply Bayesian Optimization to high-dimensional data, which would give you the theoretically best possible sample efficiency, you better think about how to infiltrate the first AI's developer team with spies in order to steal their work.

8

No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes t1_iyqj25d wrote

The human brain is complicated but everyone has ideas about how it works One of these ideas could lead to something that works for some tasks But I know what an apple is An AI can link the word in multiple languages to images but if it has never smelled, tasted, or touched an apple...

3

[deleted] t1_iypz6h2 wrote

[deleted]

1

fingin OP t1_iypzw2v wrote

Please. read. posts. before. you. reply. to. them

2

Shelfrock77 t1_iypiyvs wrote

Why is it so hard for people to understand that we are in a simulation, we are made of the computer, we are AI. We are generalized and have our own personalities.

−7

Chemical_Estate6488 t1_iypje9m wrote

Probably because that’s not true

6

Shelfrock77 t1_iypjtoo wrote

Sure thing npc, if it makes you feel better to believe that, then believe it.

−9

Chemical_Estate6488 t1_iypk43w wrote

Good rebuttal. I’m completely convinced that you’re an idiot

3

Shelfrock77 t1_iypk9xp wrote

Keep coping😭 You aren’t converting my NN similar to your architecture, on this topic. Duality is beautiful.

−7

Chemical_Estate6488 t1_iypkk1i wrote

I don’t disagree that duality is conceptually beautiful. I disagree that we are already living in a simulation and that it’s surprising that people trust their sensory input over your psychotic break

5

Shelfrock77 t1_iyplhj3 wrote

https://www.adultswim.com/videos/rick-and-morty/the-body-switching-begins

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ibli1MTAXSU

You are going to spend hundreds if not thousands of years in simulations when fdvr arrives. Stop bullshitting and trying to win this arguement😂.

−1

Chemical_Estate6488 t1_iyplwl0 wrote

Rick and Morty is a fun show. It’s not reality, man

7

Shelfrock77 t1_iypngdh wrote

You’ll understand when you connect your brain online “again”. Imagination is all you need. ASI will co-host dream machines for the conscious populace to live in. There’s many multiverses where your NN is thinking in the same logic tree i’m sitting in for that topic. Real or fake it’s still designer. You and I will own portal guns and everyone who makes it to the technological rapture.

−2

Superschlenz t1_iypu49i wrote

>Why is it so hard for people to understand that we are in a simulation

Because healthy people with a healthy mind have a healthy body, and though the mind is indeed just a simulation, the body is not.

2

AkaneTori t1_iyptcn1 wrote

Cope and seeth

−7

Johnny_Glib t1_iyrkhej wrote

It's so funny that artists are about to lose their jobs. Start learning to flip burgers, bro.

3

AkaneTori t1_iytfe4l wrote

I make more money than you with a real job in the tech sector lmao.

1