kfractal t1_j14o7tx wrote on December 21, 2022 at 5:20 PM

i can guess a few. 5 probably:

. teachers
. caregivers
. robot/machine maint
. doctors
. govt administration

but yeah, if you widen your POV a little it looks like the start of the knee.

oldmanhero OP t1_j15i0pq wrote on December 21, 2022 at 8:33 PM

Don't you think teaching via a chatGPT- like system is a possibility?

I know for certain automated machine maintenance is doable, because it's already being done.

Doctors, ditto - diagnosis via expert systems, physical procedures via the same equipment that we use for remote surgery.

I don't know what "administration" means here, but it's hard to imagine that most of the folks in bureaucracies couldn't be replaced right now, particularly if direct-democratic institutions cone to the fore.

Even caregivers may largely fall by the wayside as robotic and virtual systems and brain-machine interfaces improve.

Tyanuh t1_j14quma wrote on December 21, 2022 at 5:37 PM

Disagree with doctors. Of course you'll need some of them, but once AI will have a higher % of correct diagnosis than doctors (which is already happening in some areas) it would be unethical (not to mention inefficient) to keep just as many doctors for diagnosis.

adamsky1997 t1_j15ag8n wrote on December 21, 2022 at 7:43 PM

Ai doctor won't be able to understand nuances of what the patient tells them. Ai will only aid in analysis of lab / scan results to suggests diagnosis, prognosis and treatment options

Ketaloge t1_j15vsz1 wrote on December 21, 2022 at 10:05 PM

If course it will. And it will be much better at seeing the big picture. They may make the connections people are just not able to. I think humans will be involved in the decision making in medicine for a long time to come. But AI will be able to take every little detail into account and reference every published study in a matter of seconds. Humans simply can’t do that, that’s why we have specialists for every aspect of medicine. AI will make connections that humans never even thought of because there simply is too much to know about the human body.

adamsky1997 t1_j185rfc wrote on December 22, 2022 at 11:05 AM

So i am thinking the function of a doctor will remain, as the key orchestrator of the entire process. A person close to me is a medic, and from the stories I'm told it would be I think impossible to replace a human. Especially when a psychological aspects of the interaction affect the entire process, like wiligness to undergo or not a certain tests, try medicine, following up etc.

enilea t1_j15uwik wrote on December 21, 2022 at 9:59 PM

Why wouldn't it? I feel like a model trained specifically on medical cases could eventually be better than doctors at possible diagnosis based on vague descriptions. Only issue is people will trust a person more to do clinical inspections on them, so doctors would still be needed.

AsuhoChinami t1_j16u85b wrote on December 22, 2022 at 2:22 AM

I think AI is already a lot more capable of understanding nuance than people like you seem to think. Sometimes I feel like I'm talking to a bunch of people from 2014 or something reading this sub.

adamsky1997 t1_j184zfb wrote on December 22, 2022 at 10:55 AM

Thats the funniest insult ive ever been told. Reminds me of that Black Eyed Peas line "I'm so two thosand and eight, you're so two thousand and late"