Submitted by Dr_Singularity t3_z37m9h in singularity
Akimbo333 t1_ixm00kh wrote
Reply to comment by -ZeroRelevance- in Stable Diffusion 2.0 Release — Stability.Ai by Dr_Singularity
Oh ok. Are the hands and faces better?
-ZeroRelevance- t1_ixm0kfw wrote
Faces look better, hands still look pretty bad though. There’s some sample images in the linked post if you want to have a look, and there should be some on r/stablediffusion now too.
Akimbo333 t1_ixm1wjn wrote
Thanks! But I also heard that the model was pretty regressive as fuck! Because it Filtered out nudity Celebrities And artist styles
-ZeroRelevance- t1_ixm2x7d wrote
The nudity stuff doesn’t really matter, since it will definitely be recreated with custom models anyways, but I didn’t realise about the celebrities and artists. That will definitely be a big blow to the model, since celebrities are in a lot of the prompts that people will try for the first time, and artists are a great way to guide images into certain styles. Hopefully the community can resolve those limitations, but you’re right that it’s pretty limiting.
Also, if they removed a bunch of artists from the dataset, that means removing a massive amount of high-quality training data, which likely has significantly reduced the potential of the model. Looks like a bad move from every side but a PR one.
Akimbo333 t1_ixmannh wrote
Oh yeah I agree!!!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments