ArgentStonecutter t1_ix7bx7t wrote on November 21, 2022 at 8:13 AM

"Weakly General AI"? LOL

We're still on dumb pattern generators and they're already setting up to fake the close.

Veneck t1_ix7ibc6 wrote on November 21, 2022 at 9:51 AM

You're referring to humans right?

AsuhoChinami t1_ixgcds3 wrote on November 23, 2022 at 5:53 AM

He's a staunch technoskeptic and very rarely posts anything worth reading.

footurist t1_ix7fhfz wrote on November 21, 2022 at 9:07 AM

For some reason these people aren't willing to accept just how different a continuously learning, efficient, general abstracter like our brain is from these giant clever data crunchers.

I highly doubt they'll be able to push those to resemble what we have.

blueSGL t1_ix813x6 wrote on November 21, 2022 at 1:39 PM

now to be true AGI it needs to be efficient.

What's the next 'god of the gaps' you are going to move to after that?

footurist t1_ix81fou wrote on November 21, 2022 at 1:42 PM

The reason it needs to be efficient is the wealth and complexity of computations that are required otherwise. There's already stuff like AIXI and Schmidhuber's thing if you got a couple billion years to spare...