Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Atheios569 t1_ix4nzaj wrote

I’m surprised it’s taken this long. I’ve been waiting for this headline since 2014 when I first heard of CRISPR.

34

ihateshadylandlords t1_ix4o6gx wrote

Glad to see a rubber meets the road post. Hopefully we have more CRISPR trials as the years go on.

20

Milumet t1_ix4x3d1 wrote

"tested"

And what was the result of the test?

6

ihateshadylandlords t1_ix53y1t wrote

> A month after treatment, five of the patients’ tumors were the same size as before, suggesting that the engineered cells may have had a stabilizing effect on their condition.

> The cancer continued to progress in the other 11 patients, but the patient given the highest dose of cells saw a short term improvement in their cancer — that could mean the treatment would be more effective in future studies if administered in higher doses.

> “We just need to hit it stronger the next time,” said Ribas.

28

Prolly-wrong t1_ix5feol wrote

Now if they can just fix my heart and lung damage

18

TheForgottenHost t1_ix5q9tm wrote

Dont hold your breath yet fellas. It might back fire and go back another half decade

1

No_Fun_2020 t1_ix72trt wrote

Omnisiah, save me from this frail body

2

r0cket-b0i t1_ix7tx9k wrote

I would argue that this CRISPR and what we had in 2014 is far from being the same, the initial version was a great concept but did not live up to standards, even current iteration only shows double digit improvement but not in all people and is not what we hoped to see when we first read about slicing and re programming, however I am hopeful that there is an acceleration, baby steps but we are increasing the impact...

7

Atheios569 t1_ix7xxzv wrote

Oh indeed, improvement is marked in time, but was anticipating it a bit earlier, but not right after it was announced.

It’s just obvious that the logical way to fight cancer is on a genetic scale, and CRISPR or something similar would be the way to accomplish that.

2