Submitted by Phoenix5869 t3_z08nhx in singularity
Comments
ihateshadylandlords t1_ix4o6gx wrote
Glad to see a rubber meets the road post. Hopefully we have more CRISPR trials as the years go on.
ObjectiveDeal t1_ix4rgjk wrote
ihateshadylandlords t1_ix53y1t wrote
> A month after treatment, five of the patients’ tumors were the same size as before, suggesting that the engineered cells may have had a stabilizing effect on their condition.
> The cancer continued to progress in the other 11 patients, but the patient given the highest dose of cells saw a short term improvement in their cancer — that could mean the treatment would be more effective in future studies if administered in higher doses.
> “We just need to hit it stronger the next time,” said Ribas.
Prolly-wrong t1_ix5feol wrote
Now if they can just fix my heart and lung damage
TheForgottenHost t1_ix5q9tm wrote
Dont hold your breath yet fellas. It might back fire and go back another half decade
Vergil25 t1_ix60ze8 wrote
AsuhoChinami t1_ix68yyq wrote
Yes, it's very morally ambiguous as to whether treating cancer and other diseases is a good thing
cloudrunner69 t1_ix6ew01 wrote
All data is progress.
Vergil25 t1_ix6os13 wrote
Code of ethics on whether we "play god" as they say in medical terms.
Professional-Song216 t1_ix6p8k1 wrote
Play God? Lol which one?
AsuhoChinami t1_ix72f3u wrote
I know, but that's extremely, extremely dumb and slowing down medical research or application for that reason is the furthest thing in the world from ethical.
No_Fun_2020 t1_ix72trt wrote
Omnisiah, save me from this frail body
Vergil25 t1_ix7j602 wrote
it really is. we could accomplish so much more if the ethics board was lax
Vergil25 t1_ix7j9m0 wrote
right it's more religious dogma as a road for progress
r0cket-b0i t1_ix7tx9k wrote
I would argue that this CRISPR and what we had in 2014 is far from being the same, the initial version was a great concept but did not live up to standards, even current iteration only shows double digit improvement but not in all people and is not what we hoped to see when we first read about slicing and re programming, however I am hopeful that there is an acceleration, baby steps but we are increasing the impact...
Atheios569 t1_ix7xxzv wrote
Oh indeed, improvement is marked in time, but was anticipating it a bit earlier, but not right after it was announced.
It’s just obvious that the logical way to fight cancer is on a genetic scale, and CRISPR or something similar would be the way to accomplish that.
Calculation-Rising t1_ixabuqw wrote
Great perspective. The tributaries of many advances must accelerate whatever's possible.
Atheios569 t1_ix4nzaj wrote
I’m surprised it’s taken this long. I’ve been waiting for this headline since 2014 when I first heard of CRISPR.