bullettrain1 t1_je10dyo wrote
I don’t think we’ll see a ceo replaced with an AI anytime soon. They’re the ones that make that decision, would you replace yourself with an AI??
fluffy_assassins OP t1_je14rsp wrote
If I made $10 million a year, but having an AI do my job made me $13 million a year, and I could just chill doing whatever I wanted, I'd consider it.
And you don't have to be such a dick, this is r/nostupidquestions.
bullettrain1 t1_je1bv95 wrote
Sorry by the way, I mistakenly thought it was an article summary and not something a user wrote. Also didn’t realize which sub I was in. It was rude of me to use that tone and language in my first comment, your opinion is as valid as mine is.
fluffy_assassins OP t1_je1hcfg wrote
Ohh I've made some embarrassing comments because I thought I was in a different sub. Your points are still valid.
bullettrain1 t1_je1990c wrote
That implies all CEOs own the company. And it also assumes they wouldn’t keep the title and add it as a new executive position with all authority and take all the credit.
fluffy_assassins OP t1_je1a1b6 wrote
They wouldn't have the authority, they'd get the money and take the credit.
But the AI would have the authority and decision-making.
The CEO's "tool" would be making the decisions and that could go both ways but hey, it'd be change.
bullettrain1 t1_je1aiem wrote
My point is the livelihood of CEOs are not threatened by AI, opposed to everyone else. To your point - they will use it as a tool. That’s my issue with people saying “oh it will replace CEOs” , because it won’t put them out of work, it’ll make them richer
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments