Qumeric t1_je071bs wrote
nitpick: people sometimes misunderstand exponential growth in the following way: they think exponential means extremely fast. Actually, it is not necessarily the case, for example, computer performance was growing exponentially for almost 100 years now and is still arguably growing exponentially.
answer in spirit: GPT-4 and Codex are making many people who work on technologies much more productive.
Redducer t1_je0u4zo wrote
IMHO people are saying exponential where they should be saying geometric. It’s still very fast, but not that fast.
[deleted] t1_je08xxn wrote
[deleted]
Qumeric t1_je0a9y4 wrote
No, this is wrong too. Exponential just means growing in %. So if we have a 1% improvement every year then it is exponential.
The thing is that 1% after 1000 years will be incomparably larger than what we started with.
iNstein t1_je0df7e wrote
It is about impact. For the first 95 years, it seems kinda slow. Then it appears to be sped up because the impact is so great. The graphic of a pond filling up is a great example. 1 drop, 2 drops, 4 drops not gonna interest anyone. When pond is 1/4 full and then doubles to half full and then doubles again to full, it suddenly looks fast as hell. It is the same with the singularity.
[deleted] t1_je0f6v9 wrote
[deleted]
Qumeric t1_je0gp4p wrote
No, 1% per year is not linear growth. X% growth per amount of time is a more-or-less definition of exponential growth.
Ask ChatGPT :)
I think what you described is formally also exponential growth for somewhat complicated mathematical reasons but only coincidentally.
Informally, you described the exponential growth of the rate of growth.
[deleted] t1_je0k7s9 wrote
[deleted]
Ahaigh9877 t1_je0lqna wrote
Linear growth is going up by the same amount per unit time; exponential is going up by a proportion of the previous total per unit time. Right?
[deleted] t1_je0mk22 wrote
[deleted]
kiyotaka-6 t1_je0mxb5 wrote
Linear is Xn+1 = Xn + b
Exponential is Xn+1 = Xn (1+b)
Yes
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments